From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753062AbbEHOXm (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2015 10:23:42 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:36758 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751167AbbEHOXl (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2015 10:23:41 -0400 Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 16:23:26 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Will Deacon Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Ingo Molnar , David Ahern , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Question about barriers for ARM on tools/perf/ Message-ID: <20150508142326.GL27504@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20150508140459.GI7862@kernel.org> <20150508141620.GK27504@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20150508142156.GB25587@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150508142156.GB25587@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 03:21:56PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > The dmb things include a fence for IO, the dsb are only for between > > CPUs. > > > > So for your work the dsb are fine. > > Other way around ;) > Duh..