From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S933697AbbELRyM (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 12 May 2015 13:54:12 -0400
Received: from imap.thunk.org ([74.207.234.97]:59912 "EHLO imap.thunk.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S932809AbbELRyK (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 12 May 2015 13:54:10 -0400
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 13:54:06 -0400
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Oscar Forner Martinez <oscar.forner.martinez@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
        linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Fixed two coding style errors, spaces required
 around =
Message-ID: <20150512175406.GA18150@thunk.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Oscar Forner Martinez <oscar.forner.martinez@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
References: <1423053226-10210-1-git-send-email-oscar.forner.martinez@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1423053226-10210-1-git-send-email-oscar.forner.martinez@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on imap.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 12:33:46PM +0000, Oscar Forner Martinez wrote:
> Two lines with assignation without spaces around the =
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oscar Forner Martinez <oscar.forner.martinez@gmail.com>

NACK, we don't generally take code cleanup patches unless it's part of
changes in that part of the code.  Otherwise, code cleanup patches
break other people's pending patches which are waiting code review;
and so "code cleanup" patches end up adding negative, not positive,
value.

Regards,

					- Ted