linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Pan Xinhui <xinhuix.pan@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nick.dyer@itdev.co.uk,
	miletus@chromium.org, bleung@chromium.org, djkurtz@chromium.org,
	mnipxh@gmail.com, yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] atmel: fix an error handle in mxt_probe
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 10:41:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150513174156.GC11891@dtor-ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55377C22.9040309@intel.com>

Hi,

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 06:46:58PM +0800, Pan Xinhui wrote:
> mxt_probe() may fail at last step, and the queue_work scheduled by request_firmware_nowait
> may run later and then access some data which is freed.
> To handle this error, add one mutex_lock to cover such case. It may cause module load delay only when the probe fails.
> 
> here is the detail.
> 
> module load:                                                             worker_thread:
> mxt_probe -> mxt_initialize -> request_firmware_nowait (schedule_work)
>                    |
>             sysfs_create_group (fails)                                    mxt_config_cb -> mxt_configure_objects (may access data freed)
>                    |
>             err_free_object: some cleanup work, like free(data).
> 
> Signed-off-by: xinhuix.pan <xinhuix.pan@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c
> index 2875ddf..af057c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c
> @@ -1978,10 +1978,19 @@ err_free_mem:
>  static int mxt_configure_objects(struct mxt_data *data,
>  				 const struct firmware *cfg);
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(err_probe_lock);
> +static int err_probe;

While you are right that bad things will happen if we let
request_firmware_nowait() run after driver fails to bind to the device
using statics to indicate success or failure is not good idea since you
may have several such devices in your unit. Also it still doe snot help
if you decide to unbind the device quickly or unlock the module.

I guess the best way is to signal a completion from callback and wait
for it in error path and in remove().

Thanks.

> +
>  static void mxt_config_cb(const struct firmware *cfg, void *ctx)
>  {
> +	mutex_lock(&err_probe_lock);
> +	if (err_probe) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&err_probe_lock);
> +		return;
> +	}
>  	mxt_configure_objects(ctx, cfg);
>  	release_firmware(cfg);
> +	mutex_unlock(&err_probe_lock);
>  }
>  static int mxt_initialize(struct mxt_data *data)
> @@ -2423,6 +2432,8 @@ static int mxt_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>  	const struct mxt_platform_data *pdata;
>  	int error;
> +	err_probe = 0;
> +
>  	pdata = dev_get_platdata(&client->dev);
>  	if (!pdata) {
>  		pdata = mxt_parse_dt(client);
> @@ -2472,6 +2483,9 @@ static int mxt_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>  	return 0;
>  err_free_object:
> +	mutex_lock(&err_probe_lock);
> +	err_probe = -1;
> +	mutex_unlock(&err_probe_lock);
>  	mxt_free_input_device(data);
>  	mxt_free_object_table(data);
>  err_free_irq:
> -- 
> 1.9.1

-- 
Dmitry

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-13 17:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-22 10:46 [PATCH] atmel: fix an error handle in mxt_probe Pan Xinhui
2015-05-13 17:41 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2015-05-15  2:42   ` Pan Xinhui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150513174156.GC11891@dtor-ws \
    --to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=bleung@chromium.org \
    --cc=djkurtz@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miletus@chromium.org \
    --cc=mnipxh@gmail.com \
    --cc=nick.dyer@itdev.co.uk \
    --cc=xinhuix.pan@intel.com \
    --cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).