From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934794AbbEOQMU (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 May 2015 12:12:20 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:49967 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753478AbbEOQMR (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 May 2015 12:12:17 -0400 Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 12:12:12 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20150515.121212.20831661856896659.davem@davemloft.net> To: mkubecek@suse.cz Cc: nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, jmorris@namei.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, kaber@trash.net, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 2/2] ipv6: fix ECMP route replacement From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20150515085151.GA32190@unicorn.suse.cz> References: <5554F073.4080501@6wind.com> <20150514214907.GA20301@lion> <20150515085151.GA32190@unicorn.suse.cz> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.6 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Fri, 15 May 2015 09:12:17 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Michal Kubecek Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 10:51:52 +0200 > But I still rather feel like replacing all existing matching routes > would better reflect what I expect "replace" to do. What does IPV4 do?