From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753372AbbESGuk (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2015 02:50:40 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f177.google.com ([209.85.192.177]:34506 "EHLO mail-pd0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753850AbbESGuf (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2015 02:50:35 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 12:20:25 +0530 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Shailendra Verma , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] i2c-core: Fix typo in comment Message-ID: <20150519065025.GA5061@sudip-PC> References: <1431968041-3226-1-git-send-email-shailendra.capricorn@gmail.com> <20150519044803.GA3820@sudip-PC> <20150519055508.GE3820@sudip-PC> <20150519062046.GB4448@schokonusskuchen.bad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150519062046.GB4448@schokonusskuchen.bad> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 08:20:47AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:25:08AM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > You do not need to mention the count of your older patches here. > > While technically true... > > > When you mentioned 11/11, it meant your current submission is a patchset > > of 11 patches. So when the maintainer decides to apply your patch he will > > search your remaining 10 patches because he needs to apply them in series. > > ... this doesn't matter much for such cleanup series. They obviously > have no dependency and I assume that the other patches are for other > subsystems. This is fine, too. yes, I also asssumed the same. But it turned out that he has sent 10/10 on 15th May, and then 11/11 , 12/12 , 13/13 and 14/14 on May 18th. So I assumed that it is a wrong setting while creating his patch. isn't it? regards sudip