From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753311AbbEZNUT (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2015 09:20:19 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:37412 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753653AbbEZNT6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2015 09:19:58 -0400 Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 15:19:50 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Stephane Eranian Cc: Ingo Molnar , Vince Weaver , Jiri Olsa , "Liang, Kan" , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/11] perf/x86: Improve HT workaround GP counter constraint Message-ID: <20150526131950.GO3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20150522132905.416122812@infradead.org> <20150522133135.447912500@infradead.org> <20150526101548.GL3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 04:47:11AM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote: > > I'm going to overhaul the whole get/put constraints stuff first. > > Ok, I think it would be good to balance to number of get/put. It would > avoid the confusion. Is that what you are thinking about? Yes, and remove the few associated modifications to events.