linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@arm.com>,
	"hanjun.guo@linaro.org" <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
	Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>,
	Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>, Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>,
	"lenb @ kernel . org" <lenb@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"x86 @ kernel . org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [Patch v4 5/8] ARM64/PCI/ACPI: Introduce struct pci_controller for ACPI
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 10:35:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150602093525.GA23543@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1433225576-8215-6-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>

On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 07:12:53AM +0100, Jiang Liu wrote:
> From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> 
> ARM64 ACPI based PCI host bridge init needs a arch dependent
> struct pci_controller to accommodate common PCI host bridge
> code which is introduced later, or it will lead to compile
> errors on ARM64.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> Tested-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
> CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> CC: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
> CC: Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>
> CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h |   10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h
> index b008a72f8bc0..70884957f253 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,16 @@
>  #include <asm-generic/pci-bridge.h>
>  #include <asm-generic/pci-dma-compat.h>
>  
> +struct acpi_device;
> +
> +struct pci_controller {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +	struct acpi_device *companion;	/* ACPI companion device */
> +#endif
> +	int		segment;	/* PCI domain */
> +	int		node;		/* NUMA node */
> +};

There is nothing ARM64 specific in this structure. The only
reason I see you want to keep it arch specific is the iommu
pointer on x86, but I think we should find a way to make
the common bits shared across archs (ie the struct above) and
add (maybe a void*) to the generic struct to cater for arch
specific data.

Thoughts ?

Lorenzo

> +
>  #define PCIBIOS_MIN_IO		0x1000
>  #define PCIBIOS_MIN_MEM		0
>  
> -- 
> 1.7.10.4
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-02  9:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-02  6:12 [Patch v4 0/8] Consolidate ACPI PCI root common code into ACPI core Jiang Liu
2015-06-02  6:12 ` [Patch v4 1/8] ACPI/PCI: Enhance ACPI core to support sparse IO space Jiang Liu
2015-06-02  6:12 ` [Patch v4 2/8] ia64/PCI/ACPI: Use common ACPI resource parsing interface for host bridge Jiang Liu
2015-06-02  6:12 ` [Patch v4 3/8] ia64/PCI: Use common struct resource_entry to replace struct iospace_resource Jiang Liu
2015-06-02  6:12 ` [Patch v4 4/8] x86/PCI: Rename struct pci_sysdata as struct pci_controller Jiang Liu
2015-06-02  6:12 ` [Patch v4 5/8] ARM64/PCI/ACPI: Introduce struct pci_controller for ACPI Jiang Liu
2015-06-02  9:35   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2015-06-03  8:44     ` Hanjun Guo
2015-06-03  9:36       ` Jiang Liu
2015-06-03 10:03         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-06-03 10:21           ` Jiang Liu
2015-06-03 12:49             ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-06-02  6:12 ` [Patch v4 6/8] PCI/ACPI: Consolidate common PCI host bridge code into ACPI core Jiang Liu
2015-06-02  6:12 ` [Patch v4 7/8] x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common interface to support PCI host bridge Jiang Liu
2015-06-02  6:12 ` [Patch v4 8/8] ia64/PCI/ACPI: " Jiang Liu
2015-06-02  6:46 ` [Patch v4 0/8] Consolidate ACPI PCI root common code into ACPI core Hanjun Guo
2015-06-03 20:27 ` Al Stone
2015-06-04  1:54   ` Jiang Liu
2015-06-04  6:31     ` Hanjun Guo
2015-06-04  6:41       ` Jiang Liu
2015-06-04  7:02         ` Hanjun Guo
2015-06-04 15:51         ` Mark Salter
2015-06-04 16:29           ` Jiang Liu
2015-06-04 16:57             ` Mark Salter
2015-06-08  3:59             ` Hanjun Guo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150602093525.GA23543@red-moon \
    --to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=Marc.Zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).