From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755054AbbFEOWQ (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 5 Jun 2015 10:22:16 -0400
Received: from mail-wg0-f52.google.com ([74.125.82.52]:35139 "EHLO
	mail-wg0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1423540AbbFEOWN (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 5 Jun 2015 10:22:13 -0400
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 16:22:07 +0200
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] time: Do leapsecond adjustment in gettime
 fastpaths
Message-ID: <20150605142207.GB9406@localhost.localdomain>
References: <1432931068-4980-1-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org>
 <1432931068-4980-5-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org>
 <20150602090154.GA2590@gmail.com>
 <CALAqxLW6z6EHH0iCB5wbZFm-1hAUW+MrTLRmqTQin81DsuneBA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150603090452.GA9490@gmail.com>
 <CALAqxLVq+cQ4VS0rNYkGAt-d=+8yFr4Uy8D3-LbnjoZC_+niPA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150604064809.GA14685@gmail.com>
 <CALAqxLUo75Y-2Rt4fEdwq=V1AOU5uGsE2VH=0cP_FiSUXW+OyQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150605072913.GD19282@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150605072913.GD19282@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 09:29:13AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> That leaves the question; for who is this exact second edge important?

Another one: data loggers for scientific applications using UTC time
stamps.

Thanks,
Richard