From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: mhocko@suse.cz
Cc: rientjes@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] oom: always panic on OOM when panic_on_oom is configured
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 20:53:18 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201506082053.IIF18706.JFFFHOQtMLOSVO@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150608082137.GD1380@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Sat 06-06-15 15:51:35, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > For me, !__GFP_FS allocations not calling out_of_memory() _forever_ is a
> > violation of the user policy.
>
> Yes, the current behavior of GFP_NOFS is highly suboptimal, but this has
> _nothing_ what so ever to do with this patch and panic_on_oom handling.
> The former one is the page allocator proper while we are in the OOM
> killer layer here.
>
> This is not the first time you have done that. Please stop it. It makes
> a complete mess of the original discussions.
My specific area of expertise in Linux kernel is security/tomoyo/ directory.
What I could contribute with other areas is to pay attention to potential
possibilities. But I'm such outsider about other areas that I can't
differentiate the page allocator proper from the OOM killer layer.
Excuse me for focusing on the wrong issue, but I will likely unconsciously
make the same mistake again. Please ignore or point out when I made mistakes.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-08 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-01 11:59 [PATCH] oom: always panic on OOM when panic_on_oom is configured Michal Hocko
2015-06-01 15:12 ` Eric B Munson
2015-06-04 23:12 ` David Rientjes
2015-06-05 11:13 ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-06 6:51 ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-06-08 8:21 ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-08 11:53 ` Tetsuo Handa [this message]
2015-06-08 19:58 ` David Rientjes
2015-06-09 11:48 ` oom: How to handle !__GFP_FS exception? Tetsuo Handa
2015-06-09 22:41 ` David Rientjes
2015-06-08 19:51 ` [PATCH] oom: always panic on OOM when panic_on_oom is configured David Rientjes
2015-06-08 21:32 ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-08 23:20 ` David Rientjes
2015-06-09 9:43 ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-09 22:28 ` David Rientjes
2015-06-10 7:52 ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-11 0:36 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201506082053.IIF18706.JFFFHOQtMLOSVO@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--to=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).