linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>,
	riel@redhat.com, mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	morten.rasmussen@arm.com, kernel-team <Kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] sched: beef up wake_wide()
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 15:26:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150709132654.GE3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436336026.3767.53.camel@gmail.com>

On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 08:13:46AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> 
> +/*
> + * Detect 1:N waker/wakee relationship via a switching-frequency heuristic.
> + * A waker of many should wake a different task than the one last awakened
> + * at a frequency roughly N times higher than one of its wakees.  In order
> + * to determine whether we should let the load spread vs consolodating to
> + * shared cache, we look for a minimum 'flip' frequency of llc_size in one
> + * partner, and a factor of lls_size higher frequency in the other.  With
> + * both conditions met, we can be relatively sure that we are seeing a 1:N
> + * relationship, and that load size exceeds socket size.
> + */
>  static int wake_wide(struct task_struct *p)
>  {
> +	unsigned int waker_flips = current->wakee_flips;
> +	unsigned int wakee_flips = p->wakee_flips;
>  	int factor = this_cpu_read(sd_llc_size);
>  
> +	if (waker_flips < wakee_flips)
> +		swap(waker_flips, wakee_flips);

This makes the wakee/waker names useless, the end result is more like
wakee_flips := client_flips, waker_flips := server_flips.

> +	if (wakee_flips < factor || waker_flips < wakee_flips * factor)
> +		return 0;

I don't get the first condition... why would the client ever flip? It
only talks to that one server.

> +	return 1;
>  }


> @@ -5021,14 +5015,17 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *
>  {
>  	struct sched_domain *tmp, *affine_sd = NULL, *sd = NULL;
>  	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> +	int new_cpu = prev_cpu;
>  	int want_affine = 0;
>  	int sync = wake_flags & WF_SYNC;
>  
>  	rcu_read_lock();
> +	if (sd_flag & SD_BALANCE_WAKE) {
> +		want_affine = !wake_wide(p) && cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tsk_cpus_allowed(p));
> +		if (!want_affine)
> +			goto select_idle;
> +	}

So this preserves/makes worse the bug Morten spotted, even without
want_affine we should still attempt SD_BALANCE_WAKE if set.

> +
>  	for_each_domain(cpu, tmp) {
>  		if (!(tmp->flags & SD_LOAD_BALANCE))
>  			continue;

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-09 13:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-27 21:22 [PATCH RESEND] sched: prefer an idle cpu vs an idle sibling for BALANCE_WAKE Josef Bacik
2015-05-28  3:46 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-05-28  9:49   ` Morten Rasmussen
2015-05-28 10:57     ` Mike Galbraith
2015-05-28 11:48       ` Morten Rasmussen
2015-05-28 11:49         ` Mike Galbraith
2015-05-28 10:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-28 11:05   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-28 14:27     ` Josef Bacik
2015-05-29 21:03     ` Josef Bacik
2015-05-30  3:55       ` Mike Galbraith
2015-06-01 19:38       ` Josef Bacik
2015-06-01 20:42         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-01 21:03           ` Josef Bacik
2015-06-02 17:12           ` Josef Bacik
2015-06-03 14:12             ` Rik van Riel
2015-06-03 14:24               ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-03 14:49                 ` Josef Bacik
2015-06-03 15:30                 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-06-03 15:57                   ` Josef Bacik
2015-06-03 16:53                     ` Mike Galbraith
2015-06-03 17:16                       ` Josef Bacik
2015-06-03 17:43                         ` Mike Galbraith
2015-06-03 20:34                           ` Josef Bacik
2015-06-04  4:52                             ` Mike Galbraith
2015-06-01 22:15         ` Rik van Riel
2015-06-11 20:33     ` Josef Bacik
2015-06-12  3:42       ` Rik van Riel
2015-06-12  5:35     ` Mike Galbraith
2015-06-17 18:06       ` Josef Bacik
2015-06-18  0:55         ` Mike Galbraith
2015-06-18  3:46           ` Josef Bacik
2015-06-18  4:12             ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-02 17:44               ` Josef Bacik
2015-07-03  6:40                 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-03  9:29                   ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-04 15:57                   ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-05  7:17                     ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-06  5:13                       ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-06 14:34                         ` Josef Bacik
2015-07-06 18:36                           ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-06 19:41                             ` Josef Bacik
2015-07-07  4:01                               ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-07  9:43                                 ` [patch] " Mike Galbraith
2015-07-07 13:40                                   ` Josef Bacik
2015-07-07 15:24                                     ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-07 17:06                                   ` Josef Bacik
2015-07-08  6:13                                     ` [patch] sched: beef up wake_wide() Mike Galbraith
2015-07-09 13:26                                       ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-07-09 14:07                                         ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-09 14:46                                           ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-10  5:19                                         ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-10 13:41                                           ` Josef Bacik
2015-07-10 20:59                                           ` Josef Bacik
2015-07-11  3:11                                             ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-13 13:53                                               ` Josef Bacik
2015-07-14 11:19                                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-14 13:49                                                 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-14 14:07                                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-14 14:17                                                     ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-14 15:04                                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-14 15:39                                                         ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-14 16:01                                                           ` Josef Bacik
2015-07-14 17:59                                                             ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-15 17:11                                                               ` Josef Bacik
2015-08-03 17:07                                                           ` [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Beef " tip-bot for Mike Galbraith
2015-05-28 11:16   ` [PATCH RESEND] sched: prefer an idle cpu vs an idle sibling for BALANCE_WAKE Mike Galbraith
2015-05-28 11:49     ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-28 12:15       ` Mike Galbraith
2015-05-28 12:19         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-28 12:29           ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-28 15:22           ` David Ahern
2015-05-28 11:55 ` Srikar Dronamraju

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150709132654.GE3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=Kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=jbacik@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).