linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Calvin Owens <calvinowens@fb.com>
Cc: Nagalakshmi Nandigama <nagalakshmi.nandigama@avagotech.com>,
	Praveen Krishnamoorthy <praveen.krishnamoorthy@avagotech.com>,
	Sreekanth Reddy <sreekanth.reddy@avagotech.com>,
	Abhijit Mahajan <abhijit.mahajan@avagotech.com>,
	MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@avagotech.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mpt2sas: Refcount sas_device objects and fix unsafe list usage
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 23:52:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150713065206.GC31842@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436675096-324527-2-git-send-email-calvinowens@fb.com>

On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 09:24:55PM -0700, Calvin Owens wrote:
> These objects can be referenced concurrently throughout the driver, we
> need a way to make sure threads can't delete them out from under each
> other. This patch adds the refcount, and refactors the code to use it.
> 
> Additionally, we cannot iterate over the sas_device_list without
> holding the lock, or we risk corrupting random memory if items are
> added or deleted as we iterate. This patch refactors _scsih_probe_sas()
> to use the sas_device_list in a safe way.
> 
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
> Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
> Signed-off-by: Calvin Owens <calvinowens@fb.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_base.h      |  22 +-
>  drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_scsih.c     | 434 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_transport.c |  12 +-
>  3 files changed, 315 insertions(+), 153 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_base.h b/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_base.h
> index caff8d1..78f41ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_base.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_base.h
> @@ -238,6 +238,7 @@
>   * @flags: MPT_TARGET_FLAGS_XXX flags
>   * @deleted: target flaged for deletion
>   * @tm_busy: target is busy with TM request.
> + * @sdev: The sas_device associated with this target
>   */
>  struct MPT2SAS_TARGET {
>  	struct scsi_target *starget;
> @@ -248,6 +249,7 @@ struct MPT2SAS_TARGET {
>  	u32	flags;
>  	u8	deleted;
>  	u8	tm_busy;
> +	struct _sas_device *sdev;
>  };
>  
>  
> @@ -376,8 +378,24 @@ struct _sas_device {
>  	u8	phy;
>  	u8	responding;
>  	u8	pfa_led_on;
> +	struct kref refcount;
>  };
>  
> +static inline void sas_device_get(struct _sas_device *s)
> +{
> +	kref_get(&s->refcount);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void sas_device_free(struct kref *r)
> +{
> +	kfree(container_of(r, struct _sas_device, refcount));
> +}
> +
> +static inline void sas_device_put(struct _sas_device *s)
> +{
> +	kref_put(&s->refcount, sas_device_free);
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * struct _raid_device - raid volume link list
>   * @list: sas device list
> @@ -1095,7 +1113,9 @@ struct _sas_node *mpt2sas_scsih_expander_find_by_handle(struct MPT2SAS_ADAPTER *
>      u16 handle);
>  struct _sas_node *mpt2sas_scsih_expander_find_by_sas_address(struct MPT2SAS_ADAPTER
>      *ioc, u64 sas_address);
> -struct _sas_device *mpt2sas_scsih_sas_device_find_by_sas_address(
> +struct _sas_device *mpt2sas_get_sdev_by_addr(
> +    struct MPT2SAS_ADAPTER *ioc, u64 sas_address);
> +struct _sas_device *__mpt2sas_get_sdev_by_addr(
>      struct MPT2SAS_ADAPTER *ioc, u64 sas_address);
>  
>  void mpt2sas_port_enable_complete(struct MPT2SAS_ADAPTER *ioc);
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_scsih.c b/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_scsih.c
> index 3f26147..fad80ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_scsih.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_scsih.c
> @@ -526,8 +526,43 @@ _scsih_determine_boot_device(struct MPT2SAS_ADAPTER *ioc,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +struct _sas_device *
> +__mpt2sas_get_sdev_from_target(struct MPT2SAS_TARGET *tgt_priv)
> +{
> +	struct _sas_device *ret;
> +

Does this need a:

	assert_spin_locked(&ioc->sas_device_lock);

?

Otherwise this looks sensible to me.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-13  6:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-04 15:05 [PATCH] mpt2sas: mpt3sas: Fix memory corruption during initialization Sreekanth Reddy
2015-05-05 15:35 ` Tomas Henzl
2015-05-12  9:38   ` Sreekanth Reddy
2015-05-06 18:48 ` Calvin Owens
2015-05-15  3:41   ` [PATCH 0/6] Fixes for memory corruption in mpt2sas Calvin Owens
2015-05-15  3:41     ` [PATCH 1/6] Add refcount to sas_device struct Calvin Owens
2015-05-15  3:41     ` [PATCH 2/6] Refactor code to use new sas_device refcount Calvin Owens
2015-05-15  3:41     ` [PATCH 3/6] Fix unsafe sas_device_list usage Calvin Owens
2015-05-15  3:42     ` [PATCH 4/6] Add refcount to fw_event_work struct Calvin Owens
2015-05-15  3:42     ` [PATCH 5/6] Refactor code to use new fw_event refcount Calvin Owens
2015-05-15  3:42     ` [PATCH 6/6] Fix unsafe fw_event_list usage Calvin Owens
2015-06-09  3:50     ` [RESEND][PATCH 0/6] Fixes for memory corruption in mpt2sas Calvin Owens
2015-06-09  3:50       ` [PATCH 1/6] Add refcount to sas_device struct Calvin Owens
2015-07-03 15:24         ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-09  3:50       ` [PATCH 2/6] Refactor code to use new sas_device refcount Calvin Owens
2015-07-03 15:38         ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-07-12  4:15           ` Calvin Owens
2015-06-09  3:50       ` [PATCH 3/6] Fix unsafe sas_device_list usage Calvin Owens
2015-07-03 16:03         ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-09  3:50       ` [PATCH 4/6] Add refcount to fw_event_work struct Calvin Owens
2015-07-03 15:38         ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-09  3:50       ` [PATCH 5/6] Refactor code to use new fw_event refcount Calvin Owens
2015-07-03 16:00         ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-07-12  4:13           ` Calvin Owens
2015-06-09  3:50       ` [PATCH 6/6] Fix unsafe fw_event_list usage Calvin Owens
2015-07-03 16:02         ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-07-12  4:20           ` Calvin Owens
2015-07-02 20:15       ` [RESEND][PATCH 0/6] Fixes for memory corruption in mpt2sas Bart Van Assche
2015-07-12  4:24       ` [PATCH 0/2 v2] " Calvin Owens
2015-07-12  4:24         ` [PATCH 1/2] mpt2sas: Refcount sas_device objects and fix unsafe list usage Calvin Owens
2015-07-13  6:52           ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2015-07-21  7:06             ` Calvin Owens
2015-07-13 15:05           ` Joe Lawrence
2015-07-21  7:04             ` Calvin Owens
2015-07-16 14:57           ` Sreekanth Reddy
2015-07-21  7:03             ` Calvin Owens
2015-07-12  4:24         ` [PATCH 2/2] mpt2sas: Refcount fw_events " Calvin Owens
2015-07-13  6:52           ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-08-01  5:02         ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Fixes for memory corruption in mpt2sas Calvin Owens
2015-08-01  5:02           ` [PATCH v3 1/2] mpt2sas: Refcount sas_device objects and fix unsafe list usage Calvin Owens
2015-08-10 13:15             ` Sreekanth Reddy
2015-08-14  1:43               ` Calvin Owens
2015-08-01  5:02           ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mpt2sas: Refcount fw_events " Calvin Owens
2015-08-14  1:48           ` [PATCH v4 0/2] Fixes for memory corruption in mpt2sas Calvin Owens
2015-08-14  1:48             ` [PATCH v4 1/2] mpt2sas: Refcount sas_device objects and fix unsafe list usage Calvin Owens
2015-08-14  1:48               ` [PATCH v4 2/2] mpt2sas: Refcount fw_events " Calvin Owens
2015-08-25 21:06                 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2015-09-04 14:35                 ` Sreekanth Reddy
2015-08-25 21:03               ` [PATCH v4 1/2] mpt2sas: Refcount sas_device objects " Nicholas A. Bellinger
2015-09-04 14:34               ` Sreekanth Reddy
2015-08-25 21:21             ` [PATCH v4 0/2] Fixes for memory corruption in mpt2sas Nicholas A. Bellinger
2015-07-02 19:22     ` [PATCH 0/6] " Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150713065206.GC31842@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@avagotech.com \
    --cc=abhijit.mahajan@avagotech.com \
    --cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
    --cc=calvinowens@fb.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nagalakshmi.nandigama@avagotech.com \
    --cc=praveen.krishnamoorthy@avagotech.com \
    --cc=sreekanth.reddy@avagotech.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).