From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752458AbbHMKF5 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 13 Aug 2015 06:05:57 -0400
Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:20461 "EHLO mga11.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752347AbbHMKF4 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 13 Aug 2015 06:05:56 -0400
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,669,1432623600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="541109694"
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 10:15:28 +0800
From: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, mingo@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: sync with the cfs_rq when changing sched class
Message-ID: <20150813021527.GB2143@intel.com>
References: <1439445355-24137-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>
 <20150813074600.GB16853@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20150813082127.GO3956@byungchulpark-X58A-UD3R>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150813082127.GO3956@byungchulpark-X58A-UD3R>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 05:21:27PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> 
> yuyang said that switched_to don't need to consider task's load because it
> can have meaningless value. but i think considering task's load is better
> than leaving it unattended at all. and we can also use switched_to if we 
> consider task's load in switched_to.

when did I say "don't need to consider..."?

Doing more does not mean better, or just trivial. BTW, the task switched_to
does not have to be switched_from before.