From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
To: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: sync with the cfs_rq when changing sched class
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 19:56:15 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150813105615.GR3956@byungchulpark-X58A-UD3R> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150813021527.GB2143@intel.com>
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:15:28AM +0800, Yuyang Du wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 05:21:27PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> >
> > yuyang said that switched_to don't need to consider task's load because it
> > can have meaningless value. but i think considering task's load is better
> > than leaving it unattended at all. and we can also use switched_to if we
> > consider task's load in switched_to.
>
> when did I say "don't need to consider..."?
>
> Doing more does not mean better, or just trivial. BTW, the task switched_to
> does not have to be switched_from before.
i see.. i need to add initialization routine for fair class..
thanks,
byungchul
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-13 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-13 5:55 [PATCH] sched: sync with the cfs_rq when changing sched class byungchul.park
2015-08-12 22:41 ` Yuyang Du
2015-08-13 7:19 ` Byungchul Park
2015-08-13 2:30 ` Yuyang Du
2015-08-13 7:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-13 8:21 ` Byungchul Park
2015-08-13 2:15 ` Yuyang Du
2015-08-13 10:56 ` Byungchul Park [this message]
2015-08-13 15:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-13 23:20 ` Yuyang Du
2015-08-14 8:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-15 6:52 ` Byungchul Park
2015-08-15 7:16 ` Byungchul Park
2015-08-13 8:42 ` Byungchul Park
2015-08-14 12:59 ` T. Zhou
2015-08-15 4:24 ` Byungchul Park
2015-08-15 12:34 ` T. Zhou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150813105615.GR3956@byungchulpark-X58A-UD3R \
--to=byungchul.park@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yuyang.du@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).