From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753239AbbHMOem (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 13 Aug 2015 10:34:42 -0400
Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com ([209.85.212.177]:37822 "EHLO
	mail-wi0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753102AbbHMOei (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 13 Aug 2015 10:34:38 -0400
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:33:33 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
        Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
        Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
        Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
        Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Have Tegra's GPIO chip depend explicitly on the
 pinctrl device
Message-ID: <20150813143332.GC26559@ulmo>
References: <1436862596-27730-1-git-send-email-tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qjNfmADvan18RZcF"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1436862596-27730-1-git-send-email-tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23+89 (0255b37be491) (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


--qjNfmADvan18RZcF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:29:53AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> Hello,
>=20
> these three patches make sure that there's an explicit dependency from
> the GPIO chip in Tegra SoCs to the corresponding pinctrl device, without
> having duplicated gpio ranges.
>=20
> By having an explicit dependency, we can do things such as probing the
> pinctrl device before the GPIO chip device to avoid deferred probes.
>=20
> Thanks,
>=20
> Tomeu
>=20
> Changes in v2:
> - Don't defer probe if the pinctrl node is disabled
> - Remove outdated comment from the commit changelog
>=20
> Tomeu Vizoso (3):
>   gpio: defer probe if pinctrl cannot be found
>   pinctrl: tegra: Only set the gpio range if needed
>   ARM: tegra: Add gpio-ranges property

Patches 2 and 3 applied to the Tegra tree. Linus, I've applied the
pinctrl patch to a separate branch, so we could use that to resolve
conflicts, should there be any.

Thierry

--qjNfmADvan18RZcF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQIcBAABCAAGBQJVzKq6AAoJEN0jrNd/PrOhUFwQAJ2bihWAy4JHtqNAB6R9c8cn
Rkp89WV4lYl0RjabA8ayFSJbMvmI02BEN5kv/XKsGlcDsl747bopfNE2cBWIgSum
vlaTXCD5gu1hey0otPYLo8Qvi9HHW/6mNdL8rjyGbI8lavmRwM61muCG6Y4JsUwW
3nhBF6Aen4oPW9vtKzaO6iJFOIg3lb0HL0Uq0OX45Qj12ztz/DJamKQ+sshuxz0v
a5/1nx1a7cIDBUyVRxaX8MHNsqeM9LvRHCbbWmKb/bKyLEzmvgPe0PDzygh+tDcT
sEl2hs7kVuaXralhrBsyGFvDP949DVV50+Ok6PaTm+6ihMJ+94SDR72F1CXjqalA
i0+h+MG2vQIEFV2uEqIgHRngFnGvstbX6Td/UU0dgqGcHtxdXDXlCoZKC3y6HURh
DDFNUY08Us+B+pHjvVjkp006VDVHyxbCiWBorILxOS88ZK5NT2X3f0hp2fBm2slo
34KDHeFf6z+dQ4gDWb1Rmd8Sw5AUkkOhL2m5gA36mOh9BYHc1N+mp4JeTkDwsI2s
aB0x+ccvXM/KmBZAU2SG8jJicqW8z7NIX9bFILjz1L2YMF815ylIZ7gBhX5ta6W4
hK/Ub9BFp6yV6Xp85gkjzWS2MRuW43WNgCvSRx22A44A9g1UJIig/Y770am5ucBA
8OjrDA+K/GB9S/Ftu9Om
=jjfI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--qjNfmADvan18RZcF--