From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752457AbbHOJT4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Aug 2015 05:19:56 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:55954 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750760AbbHOJTx (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Aug 2015 05:19:53 -0400 Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2015 11:19:50 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Ross Zwisler Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org, Dan Williams , Jonathan Corbet , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , Jens Axboe , Martin Schwidefsky , Heiko Carstens , linux390@de.ibm.com, Alexander Viro , Matthew Wilcox , Jeff Layton , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Omar Sandoval , Boaz Harrosh , Miklos Szeredi , Jan Kara , Wolfram Sang , Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= , Gerald Schaefer , Ameen Ali , "Martin K. Petersen" , Sagi Grimberg , Mike Snitzer , Tejun Heo , Shaohua Li , Ming Lei , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] pmem, dax: have direct_access use __pmem annotation Message-ID: <20150815091950.GA21487@lst.de> References: <1439484671-15718-1-git-send-email-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> <1439484671-15718-8-git-send-email-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1439484671-15718-8-git-send-email-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:51:11AM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote: > Update the annotation for the kaddr pointer returned by direct_access() > so that it is a __pmem pointer. This is consistent with the PMEM driver > and with how this direct_access() pointer is used in the DAX code. IFF we stick to the __pmem annotations this looks good. That beeing said I start to really dislike them. We don't special accesors to read/write from pmem, we just need to explicitly commit it if we want to make it persistent. So I really don't see the need to treat it special and require all the force casts to and from the attribute.