From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751984AbbH1LEk (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 28 Aug 2015 07:04:40 -0400
Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:45444 "EHLO
	atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751292AbbH1LEi (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 28 Aug 2015 07:04:38 -0400
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 13:04:36 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: "Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@goldelico.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
        Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>,
        Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
        Marek Belisko <marek@goldelico.com>,
        List for communicating with real GTA04 owners 
	<gta04-owner@goldelico.com>
Subject: Re: [Gta04-owner] [PATCH 0/4] UART slave device support - version 4
Message-ID: <20150828110436.GA6857@amd>
References: <20150511013540.5709.93626.stgit@notabene.brown>
 <CACRpkdZf2AM_7Od1kVcBxokK5CJfhnsfZ_oNSF5w7rmZmcenCg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150812092059.361e09bc@home.neil.brown.name>
 <CD86D8CD-20D8-44EF-8245-A3E49C2D3EA7@goldelico.com>
 <20150828070201.GA23975@amd>
 <0579762D-51C2-45F0-A362-EE31215A40E8@goldelico.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <0579762D-51C2-45F0-A362-EE31215A40E8@goldelico.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


> > asking "device tree maintainer opinion", and then just simply ignoring
> > it when he does not like it, and then making promises he did not keep.
> 
> Which promises did I not keep? Please be specific, instead of

You promised to shut up.

> Please have a look into our RFC implementation and study it carefully
> to learn why it is the better (IMHO more flexible, easier to maintain, more
> modular) approach. Even if you don’t like phandles.

It was also NAKed by device tree maintainers.

									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html