From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751469AbbIMIPl (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Sep 2015 04:15:41 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com ([209.85.212.181]:33372 "EHLO mail-wi0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751139AbbIMIPi (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Sep 2015 04:15:38 -0400 Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 10:15:33 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Jason Baron Cc: Jonathan Corbet , Ingo Molnar , LKML , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/static_keys: fix a silly typo Message-ID: <20150913081532.GA8488@gmail.com> References: <20150907131803.54c027e1@lwn.net> <55EF0730.3080906@akamai.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55EF0730.3080906@akamai.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Jason Baron wrote: > On 09/07/2015 03:18 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > 412758cb2670 (jump label, locking/static_keys: Update docs) introduced a > > typo that might as well get fixed. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet > > --- > > Documentation/static-keys.txt | 2 +- > > include/linux/jump_label.h | 2 +- > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/static-keys.txt b/Documentation/static-keys.txt > > index f4cb0b2..ec91158 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/static-keys.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/static-keys.txt > > @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ The updated API replacements are: > > DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(key); > > DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(key); > > static_key_likely() > > -statick_key_unlikely() > > +static_key_unlikely() > > > > 0) Abstract > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/jump_label.h b/include/linux/jump_label.h > > index 7f653e8..0684bd3 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/jump_label.h > > +++ b/include/linux/jump_label.h > > @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ > > * DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(key); > > * DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(key); > > * static_key_likely() > > - * statick_key_unlikely() > > + * static_key_unlikely() > > * > > * Jump labels provide an interface to generate dynamic branches using > > * self-modifying code. Assuming toolchain and architecture support, if we > > > > Thanks. I actually messed this up further. That's supposed to be, > 'static_branch_likely()', and 'static_branch_unlikely()'. So: > > s/static_key_likely()/static_branch_likely() > > and > > s/static_key_unlikely()/static_branch_unlikely() > > The rest of the doc appears to have it correctly. There are a few more > typos in there as well: > > 1) > > s/addtion/addition > > 2) > > " > The inc()/dec() interface is meant to be used exclusively from the > inc()/dec() for a given key. > " > > Was supposed to read: > > " > The inc()/dec() interface is meant to be used exclusively from the > enable()/disable() interface for a given key. > " > > However, I think we should just delete this sentence. As the API > inherently doesn't prevent this. The user just may need to be aware to > properly serialize operations. Would be nice to turn this into a patch! Thanks, Ingo