From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752175AbbIPAMu (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Sep 2015 20:12:50 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:44816 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751644AbbIPAMs (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Sep 2015 20:12:48 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 10:12:45 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree Message-ID: <20150916101245.60235b54@canb.auug.org.au> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.12.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi all, After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (perf) failed like this: make[3]: *** No rule to make target 'tools/lib/api/fs/debugfs.h', needed by 'tools/perf/arch/common.o'. Stop. tools/build/Makefile.build:109: recipe for target 'arch' failed make[4]: *** No rule to make target 'fs/debugfs.h', needed by 'tools/perf/fs/fs.o'. Stop. tools/build/Makefile.build:109: recipe for target 'fs' failed make[3]: *** No rule to make target 'tools/lib/api/fs/debugfs.h', needed by 'tools/perf/util/abspath.o'. Stop. tools/build/Makefile.build:109: recipe for target 'util' failed Makefile:32: recipe for target 'tools/perf/libapi-in.o' failed Makefile.perf:417: recipe for target 'tools/perf/libapi.a' failed Makefile.perf:393: recipe for target 'tools/perf/libperf-in.o' failed Makefile:68: recipe for target 'all' failed Maybe caused by commit 60a1133a5b39 ("tools lib api fs: Remove debugfs, tracefs and findfs objects") This is an incremental build i.e. I do not do a "make clean" after doing the build for each tree merge (in case that matters). I have used the tip tree from next-20150915 for today. Also, building perf seems to ignore O= on the make invocation. Is that expected? -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au