From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752559AbbIQS1n (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Sep 2015 14:27:43 -0400 Received: from down.free-electrons.com ([37.187.137.238]:39008 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752386AbbIQS1k (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Sep 2015 14:27:40 -0400 Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 20:27:37 +0200 From: Maxime Ripard To: Oliver Hartkopp Cc: Gerhard Bertelsmann , wg@grandegger.com, mkl@pengutronix.de, linux-can@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] can: Allwinner A10/A20 CAN Controller support - Summary Message-ID: <20150917182737.GK4684@lukather> References: <1442402482-7118-1-git-send-email-info@gerhard-bertelsmann.de> <20150917175444.GJ4684@lukather> <55FB028F.7070206@hartkopp.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Jaerp9zHWz52Eeko" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55FB028F.7070206@hartkopp.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Jaerp9zHWz52Eeko Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 08:12:31PM +0200, Oliver Hartkopp wrote: >=20 >=20 > On 17.09.2015 19:54, Maxime Ripard wrote: > >On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 01:21:18PM +0200, Gerhard Bertelsmann wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >>please find attached the next version of my patch set. I have > >>taken all remarks from Maxime Ripard into the new version > >> > >>Please review, test and report bugs if exists. > >> > >>The patchset applies to all recent Kernel versions (4.x, next etc.). > >> > >>[PATCH v8 1/4] Device Tree Binding Documentation > >>[PATCH v8 2/4] Defconfig multi_v7 > >>[PATCH v8 3/4] Defconfig sunxi > >>[PATCH v8 4/4] Kernel Module > > > >Applied 3 and 4. >=20 > Applied to what tree? >=20 > That's not the friendly way when Marc asks you about the documentation ab= out > the device tree (patch 1) and you commit the CAN driver and the sunxi > defconfig (patch 3 & 4) that he mainly reviewed to whatever tree. >=20 > New CAN drivers go via can-next and net-next into mainline. >=20 > So please answer Marcs question and let him queue up the CAN driver via > can-next himself. Hmmm, actually, I meant 2 and 3, the two defconfig patches. The driver and bindings should of course go through Marc's tree. Maxime --=20 Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com --Jaerp9zHWz52Eeko Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJV+wYZAAoJEBx+YmzsjxAgoNgQAJA769lQEPmx6R2siEogC4H+ 5moHtwSTDxKXJYaAMMFNRYmCHH9SRzTpSn4ANeKkDSsMAHG42IbiLQv70egzE01O aQsRq57Q4pXBmVUI0DBR+ZhdyCuqQpO0RIfrI1uG9nLE5ySf7Ui9ADH8IAjXGukb ldihtG44haMzI3CUpq5KpwZs/03Bb+MIeq+7OoyYEwsb4K5GaLr7nB0YyzgLzHDd pWjoj/Ja4ir1MOTV3thDhap5iwy8RPxMABYQ01lGIdK5+0F/ZXIcX1cHG2FEyc++ Qs0C6kDZKLD0wPudMO9DcDtoW4RnyDsXQPoxlI0281o3F+vzEjQHvfgUY156nQ6x yDI/MCv3L9q43TYrr+bdEWihSh1O6FQKEB7wP9qW/X0RnaJb9DG9BjviW0NfsVNr yyhb77x1ERRtvUoNb1OTZL9VB17HFzslGu/bb874ncZJsuqo9ojUIej9bo1XZN0U WNt4BFGpeJkk+XbWSYlj47K8eEMpCdZsLk7hLpD7da51MMhkDrfSw8SgTzrgztYV cuEM55U87XuIija9oUDjr5bt8W+m1vUrkdZeq91s0PKdtnxQxtj+r2bwBG0ZVLb3 PwGWY2QUM6nP/h2Vc3iVI1uMEgnWWowYT/W15dmUyEZvT0o/omtHf3nOx934enHb PusHJWTwOxXJUHR0TIaO =U3hC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Jaerp9zHWz52Eeko--