linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jonathan Zhang <zjzhang@codeaurora.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 18 (build failures)
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 07:22:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150918142204.GA17018@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150918140810.6345bce9@canb.auug.org.au>

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 02:08:10PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Changes since 20150917:
> 
> I used the h8300 tree from next-20150828 since the current tree has been
> rebased onto something very old :-(
> 
> The bluetooth tree still had its build failure.
> 
> The tip tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
> 
> The akpm-current tree lost its build failure.
> 
> Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1938
>  1581 files changed, 83940 insertions(+), 23948 deletions(-)
> 

Build failures:

ia64:defconfig
ia64:allnoconfig

drivers/built-in.o: In function `efi_mem_attributes':
(.text+0xde962): undefined reference to `memmap'
drivers/built-in.o: In function `efi_mem_attributes':
(.text+0xde971): undefined reference to `memmap'

Bisect points to 'efi, x86: Rearrange efi_mem_attributes()'.
On a side note, 'memmap' is really a bad name for a global variable,
As the patch desciption suggests, the variable does not exist for ia64,
so the build failure is not entirely unexpected.

----
powerpc:ppc64e_defconfig
powerpc:85xx/sbc8548_defconfig

arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c: In function 'fsl_pci_mcheck_exception':
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c:1002:4: error: passing argument 2 of 'probe_kernel_read' makes pointer from integer without a cast

Bisect points to 'uaccess: reimplement probe_kernel_address() using
probe_kernel_read()'.

Guenter

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-18 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-18  4:08 linux-next: Tree for Sep 18 Stephen Rothwell
2015-09-18 14:22 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2015-10-02 16:16   ` linux-next: Tree for Sep 18 (build failures, up to 10/02) Guenter Roeck
2015-10-03 22:26     ` Matt Fleming
2015-10-10 16:26       ` Matt Fleming
2015-10-11  9:06       ` [tip:core/efi] efi: Use the generic efi.memmap instead of 'memmap ' tip-bot for Matt Fleming

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150918142204.GA17018@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=zjzhang@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).