From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754786AbbI3ILr (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:11:47 -0400
Received: from mail-pa0-f51.google.com ([209.85.220.51]:33397 "EHLO
	mail-pa0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754515AbbI3ILF (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:11:05 -0400
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:13:04 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
        Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        =?utf-8?B?6rmA7KSA7IiY?= <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
        Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] allow zram to use zbud as underlying allocator
Message-ID: <20150930081304.GE12727@bbox>
References: <20150914154901.92c5b7b24e15f04d8204de18@gmail.com>
 <20150915061349.GA16485@bbox>
 <CAMJBoFM_bMvQthAJPK+w4uQznqp7eFLdk=c7ZtT-R1aoF-1SeA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150930075203.GC12727@bbox>
 <CAMJBoFN3j5eZh4+4dnJya9=8Jo=3O9u+v7g0Ka+aVaQyMOG2ew@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMJBoFN3j5eZh4+4dnJya9=8Jo=3O9u+v7g0Ka+aVaQyMOG2ew@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:01:59AM +0200, Vitaly Wool wrote:
> > Could you share your script?
> > I will ask our production team to reproduce it.
> 
> Wait, let me get it right. Your production team?
> I take it as you would like me to help your company fix your bugs.
> You are pushing the limits here.

I'm really sorry if you take it as fixing my bugs.
I never wanted it but just want to help your problem.
Please read LKML. Normally, developers wanted to share test script to
reproduce the problem because it's easier to solve the problem
without consuming much time with ping-pong.

Anyway, I have shared my experience to you and suggest patches and
on-going works. In your concept, I shouldn't do that for fixing
your problems so I shouldn't help you any more? Right?

> 
> ~vitaly