From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753520AbbJBNcY (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 2 Oct 2015 09:32:24 -0400
Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:15019 "EHLO mga11.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752795AbbJBNcV (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 2 Oct 2015 09:32:21 -0400
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,623,1437462000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="782741396"
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 21:32:12 +0800
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [lkp] [PATCH v4 3/5] mfd: tps65912: Add driver for the TPS65912
 PMIC
Message-ID: <20151002133212.GA18604@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>
References: <1443731874-21362-4-git-send-email-afd@ti.com>
 <201510020451.0XYHKQyq%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
 <20151002095859.GN12635@sirena.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20151002095859.GN12635@sirena.org.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

[CC LKML]

On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 10:58:59AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 04:51:11AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> > 
> > [auto build test results on v4.3-rc3 -- if it's inappropriate base, please ignore]
> > 
> > config: x86_64-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
> > reproduce:
> >         git checkout d617dea974adf7dc262f2d49dea24a673e0403e2
> >         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> >         make ARCH=x86_64 
> > 
> > All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
> It would be good if somewhere early on in these mails the report said if
> the build failed - that's key information about how urgent issues are
> and it's not always clear if things are errors or warnings.

When the robot say "All error/warnings" it has build failure (and
possibly warnings). If there are only build warnings it'll say

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

Would you like making that line more clear, or show the info
earlier in the email body or even email title? For example,
the first line could be changed to

[auto build test ERROR on v4.3-rc3 -- if it's inappropriate base, please ignore]
[auto build test WARNING on v4.3-rc3 -- if it's inappropriate base, please ignore]

depending on whether it has build failure or just warnings.

Thanks,
Fengguang