From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753785AbbJBNsK (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Oct 2015 09:48:10 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:35669 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753065AbbJBNsG (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Oct 2015 09:48:06 -0400 Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 14:47:58 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Fengguang Wu Cc: LKML Message-ID: <20151002134758.GP12635@sirena.org.uk> References: <1443731874-21362-4-git-send-email-afd@ti.com> <201510020451.0XYHKQyq%fengguang.wu@intel.com> <20151002095859.GN12635@sirena.org.uk> <20151002133212.GA18604@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ga5bsqHr1s/xcZEm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151002133212.GA18604@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> X-Cookie: Walk softly and carry a megawatt laser. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:348:6:8808:7e7a:91ff:fede:4a45 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [lkp] [PATCH v4 3/5] mfd: tps65912: Add driver for the TPS65912 PMIC X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --ga5bsqHr1s/xcZEm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 09:32:12PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 10:58:59AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > It would be good if somewhere early on in these mails the report said if > > the build failed - that's key information about how urgent issues are > > and it's not always clear if things are errors or warnings. > When the robot say "All error/warnings" it has build failure (and > possibly warnings). If there are only build warnings it'll say > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): Ah, I see - it's more clear in the warnings only case, it's less obvious in the errors case that this message would be different if there were only warnings. > Would you like making that line more clear, or show the info > earlier in the email body or even email title? For example, > the first line could be changed to > [auto build test ERROR on v4.3-rc3 -- if it's inappropriate base, please ignore] > [auto build test WARNING on v4.3-rc3 -- if it's inappropriate base, please ignore] > depending on whether it has build failure or just warnings. That would be excellent, yes. --ga5bsqHr1s/xcZEm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWDosHAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQ1r4H/1fg067lIt+to6PSB4+X1AQC 13fz3WgjZWBRsNAJ8UfiE5l8NsQ0ptbyCGN6izxqc7TW92sL7yDpOFAMMlTC3orP S+po3Vvw9qR8YJmeY+1r4ORzF7uoPrXjnNGU+bRJLQNsnSa4CYFSGIAzgjLpa66M 8aZY877NSVcJncSK9bm76eRbdKIpkfxWY1cASQSzN++FqY0VB1hh4NObTxehIapc l9xunB6+wNV/kOS3Ec+wxnN+J0KCRy9/1qcqivRFCpVMtWqyS+dM1JNE8Ks4Z1A/ BA+w9lUaJyXuvUEHU5d8Q9vYC47QkXNeL8wd9WnQK0T3SwWZo2GiiPk7KuiOYms= =B/2F -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ga5bsqHr1s/xcZEm--