From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
pjt@google.com, bsegall@google.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] sched/fair: Generalize the load/util averages resolution definition
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 09:04:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151005070445.GA10526@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1443981419-16665-2-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.com>
* Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com> wrote:
> +# define SCHED_RESOLUTION_SHIFT 10
> #if 0 /* BITS_PER_LONG > 32 -- currently broken: it increases power usage under light load */
Might be worth fixing?
Also, I noticed this:
> -# define SCHED_LOAD_RESOLUTION 10
> +# define SCHED_LOAD_SHIFT (SCHED_RESOLUTION_SHIFT + SCHED_RESOLUTION_SHIFT)
So in the #if 0 (inactive) section we change it from 10 to 20 ...
> -# define SCHED_LOAD_RESOLUTION 0
> +# define SCHED_LOAD_SHIFT (SCHED_RESOLUTION_SHIFT)
> # define scale_load(w) (w)
> # define scale_load_down(w) (w)
> #endif
>
> -#define SCHED_LOAD_SHIFT (10 + SCHED_LOAD_RESOLUTION)
... then we change the actually active definition from 20 to 10?
Was that intended?
Please double check the 'make allyesconfig' disassembly of kernel/sched/built-in.o
before/after this patch to make sure it does not change any code.
( No full allyesconfig build needed: 'make -j16 kernel/sched' should cut down on
the build time. )
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-05 7:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-04 17:56 [PATCH 0/4] sched/fair: Clean up sched metric definitions Yuyang Du
2015-10-04 17:56 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched/fair: Generalize the load/util averages resolution definition Yuyang Du
2015-10-05 7:04 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-10-06 8:00 ` Yuyang Du
2015-10-09 23:04 ` Yuyang Du
2015-10-05 10:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-04 17:56 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched/fair: Remove SCHED_LOAD_SHIFT and SCHED_LOAD_SCALE Yuyang Du
2015-10-06 9:29 ` Vincent Guittot
2015-10-04 17:56 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched/fair: Remove scale_load_down() for load_avg Yuyang Du
2015-10-04 17:56 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched/fair: Rename scale_load() and scale_load_down() Yuyang Du
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151005070445.GA10526@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=yuyang.du@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).