From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751520AbbJEK6d (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Oct 2015 06:58:33 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com ([209.85.212.176]:33009 "EHLO mail-wi0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750780AbbJEK6b (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Oct 2015 06:58:31 -0400 Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 12:58:28 +0200 From: Thierry Reding To: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" Cc: Emil Velikov , ML dri-devel , Mark Rutland , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , linux-kernel , Rob Herring , Kumar Gala Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND] drm: panel-simple: add URT UMSH-8596MD-xT panel support Message-ID: <20151005105609.GD30219@ulmo> References: <55E5AD23.8070309@maciej.szmigiero.name> <560EF9C0.7080407@maciej.szmigiero.name> <5611B75D.9030700@maciej.szmigiero.name> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4VrXvz3cwkc87Wze" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5611B75D.9030700@maciej.szmigiero.name> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23+102 (2ca89bed6448) (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --4VrXvz3cwkc87Wze Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 01:33:49AM +0200, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote: > Hi Emil, >=20 > Thanks for your response, >=20 > On 04.10.2015 12:43, Emil Velikov wrote: > > Hi Maciej, > >=20 > > On 2 October 2015 at 22:40, Maciej S. Szmigiero > > wrote: > >> Anybody here? > >> > >> I've already submitted this patch two times but received no response... > >> > > Seems that the maintainer (Thierry) isn't Cc'ed. >=20 > Yes, he was Cc'ed - see for example https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/51= 2858/ . Sorry, I never received any of your earlier patches. It's in none of my mailboxes nor was it classified as spam. Even searching by message ID doesn't give me a positive hit. > > You might want to > > split the DT binding and vendor prefix to separate patches. >=20 > Do you mean to first submit new vendor prefix then panel patch with docs? > Or even docs separately? This should be three patches: the vendor prefix is usually a separate patch and needs an Acked-by from one of the device tree bindings maintainers. The binding itself should also be a separate patch and the driver changes should come last. Thierry --4VrXvz3cwkc87Wze Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCAAGBQJWElfUAAoJEN0jrNd/PrOhvZEP/3wyhojINC4gXWaoEgh4mvG3 CY2xXDPNFB8tNMGjjBr6swwTgUH2WjbQee9YViQPqnhtzxn4qz0EcxPeog1TONcn eURRzV5SetSNc++0dBclIhqqnVKWSyuPmxOSDh9DjPpP3KGme/wr2rJ95lk5PTxf yS8o5dvx3oos0S4mq+ntcWpvXMTqovJR0Lk0NNe4KEgY3FftOFb1fWa/qWmsxvDq cyhsh6vFalEwOWctLGozbxnyF+qQ/CHU5Kbjk9pVDNQ1ZzxUg3K0U5QgkMWQr1BP ZaadFOWVLZBT1laiXMg7HAIpcBu+HwSMqofAP5OMAc8jE6PckAAEnN2/RWxyu6GX OPdvx55A+VqVLrnmQEQ6dCLtcqM2DAwCAJd8Pga2FfXXIFJrx8YhCPj4aYJMZDVS 29Q6LCR/a6poukYTWwwpUrN15HgQMoteIcg30hfCUIrpGG/9BzUtP4kYSuMAbSEp dbAxJRNs9J2q7qY1/ga3BsZVYeqrw69EToSo5lBjfQJyjnKh6eE4lpvi4ewkEo1y d8H+/u43pe+2UPnPe32qVn7HF2Y19Cpm4FfjLzmtde3D0YZTZhZVHreSLoAZsfxX ikzXXT3h1ijyRur9b++qQunkkCqDEF01ZoT+o4hCABq+5/iyeIRhBCRyFa39pWVn M9ZZK82brdm1GBy8oxEX =f+Qj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4VrXvz3cwkc87Wze--