Hi Peter, [auto build test ERROR on v4.3-rc4 -- if it's inappropriate base, please ignore] config: i386-randconfig-x004-201540 (attached as .config) reproduce: # save the attached .config to linux build tree make ARCH=i386 All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): kernel/rcu/tree.c: In function '_raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node': >> kernel/rcu/tree.c:1488:2: error: too many arguments to function '_raw_spin_lock_irqsave' _raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags); ^ In file included from include/linux/spinlock.h:280:0, from kernel/rcu/tree.c:33: include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:34:26: note: declared here unsigned long __lockfunc _raw_spin_lock_irqsave(raw_spinlock_t *lock) ^ kernel/rcu/tree.c: At top level: >> kernel/rcu/tree.c:1493:34: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before '(' token _raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node((rnp), &(flags)) ^ >> kernel/rcu/tree.c:1493:41: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before '&' token _raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node((rnp), &(flags)) ^ kernel/rcu/tree.c: In function 'note_gp_changes': >> kernel/rcu/tree.c:1807:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'raw_spin_trylock_rcu_node' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] !raw_spin_trylock_rcu_node(rnp)) { /* irqs already off, so later. */ ^ cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +/_raw_spin_lock_irqsave +1488 kernel/rcu/tree.c 1482 smp_mb__after_unlock_lock(); 1483 } 1484 1485 static inline void 1486 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(struct rcu_node *rnp, unsigned long *flags) 1487 { > 1488 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags); 1489 smp_mb__after_unlock_lock(); 1490 } 1491 1492 #define raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags) > 1493 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node((rnp), &(flags)) 1494 1495 static inline bool raw_spin_trylock_rcu_node(struct rcu_node *rnp) 1496 { --- 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation