From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932246AbbJNWdj (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Oct 2015 18:33:39 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40235 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753990AbbJNWdg (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Oct 2015 18:33:36 -0400 Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 19:40:58 -0300 From: Marcelo Tosatti To: "Yu, Fenghua" Cc: Thomas Gleixner , H Peter Anvin , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel , x86 , Vikas Shivappa Subject: Re: [PATCH V15 00/11] x86: Intel Cache Allocation Technology Support Message-ID: <20151013224058.GA19373@amt.cnet> References: <1443766185-61618-1-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com> <3E5A0FA7E9CA944F9D5414FEC6C712205DE5C9EE@ORSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E5A0FA7E9CA944F9D5414FEC6C712205DE5C9EE@ORSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 06:52:49PM +0000, Yu, Fenghua wrote: > > From: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:tglx@linutronix.de] > > Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2015 12:50 PM > > To: Yu, Fenghua > > Cc: H Peter Anvin; Ingo Molnar; Peter Zijlstra; linux-kernel; x86; Vikas > > Shivappa; Marcelo Tosatti > > Subject: Re: [PATCH V15 00/11] x86: Intel Cache Allocation Technology > > Support > > > > Fenghua, > > > > On Thu, 1 Oct 2015, Fenghua Yu wrote: > > > > +Cc: Marcelo > > > > > This series has some preparatory patches and Intel cache allocation > > > support. > > > > > > > > > Changes in v15: > > > - Add a global IPI to update the closid on CPUs for current tasks. > > > - Other minor changes where I remove the updating of clos_cbm_table > > > to be set to all 1s during init. > > > - Fix a few compilation warnings. > > > - Port the patches to 4.3-rc. > > > > What's the state of the interface discussion? I have not yet seen any > > agreement on that, unless I missed the important mail. > > Peter Anvin will discuss the interface with Tejun during the Kernel Summit. Hopefully Tejun will agree with the current cgroup interface in the patch set. How can you fix the issue of sockets with different reserved cache regions with hw in the cgroup interface?