From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753096AbbJOLgU (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 15 Oct 2015 07:36:20 -0400
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:34768 "EHLO
	bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752956AbbJOLgS (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 15 Oct 2015 07:36:18 -0400
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 13:36:14 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
        H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
        Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V15 00/11] x86: Intel Cache Allocation Technology Support
Message-ID: <20151015113614.GL3816@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <1443766185-61618-1-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.11.1510112145100.6097@nanos>
 <20151013213125.GA16200@amt.cnet>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20151013213125.GA16200@amt.cnet>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 06:31:27PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> I am rewriting the interface with ioctls, with commands similar to the
> syscall interface proposed.

Which is horrible for other use cases. I really don't see the problem
with the cgroup stuff.