linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/locking/core v5 1/6] powerpc: atomic: Make _return atomics and *{cmp}xchg fully ordered
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 18:11:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151026101116.GA21685@fixme-laptop.cn.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1445853057-20735-2-git-send-email-boqun.feng@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4866 bytes --]

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 05:50:52PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> This patch fixes two problems to make value-returning atomics and
> {cmp}xchg fully ordered on PPC.
> 
> According to memory-barriers.txt:
> 
> > Any atomic operation that modifies some state in memory and returns
> > information about the state (old or new) implies an SMP-conditional
> > general memory barrier (smp_mb()) on each side of the actual
> > operation ...
> 
> which means these operations should be fully ordered. However on PPC,
> PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER is the barrier before the actual operation,
> which is currently "lwsync" if SMP=y. The leading "lwsync" can not
> guarantee fully ordered atomics, according to Paul Mckenney:
> 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/14/970
> 
> To fix this, we define PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER as "sync" to guarantee
> the fully-ordered semantics.
> 
> This also makes futex atomics fully ordered, which can avoid possible
> memory ordering problems if userspace code relies on futex system call
> for fully ordered semantics.
> 
> Another thing to fix is that xchg, cmpxchg and their atomic{64}_
> versions are currently RELEASE+ACQUIRE, which are not fully ordered.
> 
> So also replace PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER and PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER with
> PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER and PPC_ATOMIC_EXIT_BARRIER in
> __{cmp,}xchg_{u32,u64} respectively to guarantee fully ordered semantics
> of atomic{,64}_{cmp,}xchg() and {cmp,}xchg(), as a complement of commit
> b97021f85517 ("powerpc: Fix atomic_xxx_return barrier semantics").
> 
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.4+

Hmm.. I use the same Cc tag as v4, seems my git(2.6.2) send-email has a
weird behavior of composing Cc address?

I will resend this one soon, sorry ;-(

Regards,
Boqun

> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> ---
> 
> Michael, I also change PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER as "sync" if SMP=y in this
> version , which is different from the previous one, so request for a new ack.
> Thank you ;-)
> 
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/cmpxchg.h | 16 ++++++++--------
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/synch.h   |  2 +-
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cmpxchg.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
> index ad6263c..d1a8d93 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
> @@ -18,12 +18,12 @@ __xchg_u32(volatile void *p, unsigned long val)
>  	unsigned long prev;
>  
>  	__asm__ __volatile__(
> -	PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER
> +	PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER
>  "1:	lwarx	%0,0,%2 \n"
>  	PPC405_ERR77(0,%2)
>  "	stwcx.	%3,0,%2 \n\
>  	bne-	1b"
> -	PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER
> +	PPC_ATOMIC_EXIT_BARRIER
>  	: "=&r" (prev), "+m" (*(volatile unsigned int *)p)
>  	: "r" (p), "r" (val)
>  	: "cc", "memory");
> @@ -61,12 +61,12 @@ __xchg_u64(volatile void *p, unsigned long val)
>  	unsigned long prev;
>  
>  	__asm__ __volatile__(
> -	PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER
> +	PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER
>  "1:	ldarx	%0,0,%2 \n"
>  	PPC405_ERR77(0,%2)
>  "	stdcx.	%3,0,%2 \n\
>  	bne-	1b"
> -	PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER
> +	PPC_ATOMIC_EXIT_BARRIER
>  	: "=&r" (prev), "+m" (*(volatile unsigned long *)p)
>  	: "r" (p), "r" (val)
>  	: "cc", "memory");
> @@ -151,14 +151,14 @@ __cmpxchg_u32(volatile unsigned int *p, unsigned long old, unsigned long new)
>  	unsigned int prev;
>  
>  	__asm__ __volatile__ (
> -	PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER
> +	PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER
>  "1:	lwarx	%0,0,%2		# __cmpxchg_u32\n\
>  	cmpw	0,%0,%3\n\
>  	bne-	2f\n"
>  	PPC405_ERR77(0,%2)
>  "	stwcx.	%4,0,%2\n\
>  	bne-	1b"
> -	PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER
> +	PPC_ATOMIC_EXIT_BARRIER
>  	"\n\
>  2:"
>  	: "=&r" (prev), "+m" (*p)
> @@ -197,13 +197,13 @@ __cmpxchg_u64(volatile unsigned long *p, unsigned long old, unsigned long new)
>  	unsigned long prev;
>  
>  	__asm__ __volatile__ (
> -	PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER
> +	PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER
>  "1:	ldarx	%0,0,%2		# __cmpxchg_u64\n\
>  	cmpd	0,%0,%3\n\
>  	bne-	2f\n\
>  	stdcx.	%4,0,%2\n\
>  	bne-	1b"
> -	PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER
> +	PPC_ATOMIC_EXIT_BARRIER
>  	"\n\
>  2:"
>  	: "=&r" (prev), "+m" (*p)
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/synch.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/synch.h
> index e682a71..c508686 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/synch.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/synch.h
> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ static inline void isync(void)
>  	MAKE_LWSYNC_SECTION_ENTRY(97, __lwsync_fixup);
>  #define PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER	 "\n" stringify_in_c(__PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER)
>  #define PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER	 stringify_in_c(LWSYNC) "\n"
> -#define PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER "\n" stringify_in_c(LWSYNC) "\n"
> +#define PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER "\n" stringify_in_c(sync) "\n"
>  #define PPC_ATOMIC_EXIT_BARRIER	 "\n" stringify_in_c(sync) "\n"
>  #else
>  #define PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER
> -- 
> 2.6.2
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-26 10:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-26  9:50 [PATCH tip/locking/core v5 0/6] atomics: powerpc: Implement relaxed/acquire/release variants of some atomics Boqun Feng
2015-10-26  9:50 ` [PATCH tip/locking/core v5 1/6] powerpc: atomic: Make _return atomics and *{cmp}xchg fully ordered Boqun Feng
2015-10-26 10:11   ` Boqun Feng [this message]
2015-10-26  9:50 ` [PATCH tip/locking/core v5 2/6] atomics: Add test for atomic operations with _relaxed variants Boqun Feng
2015-10-26  9:50 ` [PATCH tip/locking/core v5 3/6] atomics: Allow architectures to define their own __atomic_op_* helpers Boqun Feng
2015-10-26  9:50 ` [PATCH tip/locking/core v5 4/6] powerpc: atomic: Implement atomic{,64}_*_return_* variants Boqun Feng
2015-10-26  9:50 ` [PATCH tip/locking/core v5 5/6] powerpc: atomic: Implement xchg_* and atomic{,64}_xchg_* variants Boqun Feng
2015-10-26  9:50 ` [PATCH tip/locking/core v5 6/6] powerpc: atomic: Implement cmpxchg{,64}_* and atomic{,64}_cmpxchg_* variants Boqun Feng
2015-10-26 10:15 ` [PATCH RESEND tip/locking/core v5 1/6] powerpc: atomic: Make _return atomics and *{cmp}xchg fully ordered Boqun Feng
2015-10-27  2:33   ` [RESEND, tip/locking/core, v5, " Michael Ellerman
2015-10-27  3:06     ` Boqun Feng
2015-10-30  0:56       ` Boqun Feng
2015-11-02  1:22         ` Boqun Feng
2015-11-04  1:22           ` Boqun Feng
2015-11-04 10:15             ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151026101116.GA21685@fixme-laptop.cn.ibm.com \
    --to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=waiman.long@hp.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).