From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753557AbbJ0Fqp (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2015 01:46:45 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.220.43]:33581 "EHLO mail-pa0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751280AbbJ0Fqo (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2015 01:46:44 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 14:46:34 +0900 From: Tejun Heo To: Mike Galbraith Cc: Paul Turner , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Johannes Weiner , lizefan@huawei.com, cgroups , LKML , kernel-team , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched: Implement interface for cgroup unified hierarchy Message-ID: <20151027054634.GA16310@mtj.duckdns.org> References: <20150912144007.GA8942@htj.duckdns.org> <20151001184629.GB26498@mtj.duckdns.org> <20151023222110.GA4390@mtj.duckdns.org> <1445661367.3218.62.camel@gmail.com> <20151025021829.GA15471@mtj.duckdns.org> <1445744613.3180.60.camel@gmail.com> <20151027031656.GA11962@mtj.duckdns.org> <1445924531.2909.79.camel@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1445924531.2909.79.camel@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 06:42:11AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > Sure, sounds fine, I just fervently hope that the below is foul swamp > gas having nothing what so ever to do with your definition of "saner". lol, idk, you keep taking things in weird directions. Let's just stay technical, okay? > http://www.linuxfoundation.org/news-media/blogs/browse/2013/08/all-about-linux-kernel-cgroup%E2%80%99s-redesign > > http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/ControlGroupInterface/ > > I'm not into begging. I really don't want to have to ask anyone to > pretty please do for me what I can currently do all by my little self > without having to give a rats ass less whether what I want to do fits in > the world view of this or that obnoxious little control freak. Well, if you think certain things are being missed, please speak up. Not in some media campaign way but with technical reasoning and justifications. Thanks. -- tejun