Hi Arnd,

On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 09:27:03AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 October 2015 17:50:24 Jens Kuske wrote:
> > 
> > +static int sun8i_h3_bus_reset_xlate(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> > +                                   const struct of_phandle_args *reset_spec)
> > +{
> > +       unsigned int index = reset_spec->args[0];
> > +
> > +       if (index < 96)
> > +               return index;
> > +       else if (index < 128)
> > +               return index + 32;
> > +       else if (index < 160)
> > +               return index + 64;
> > +       else
> > +               return -EINVAL;
> > +}
> > +
> > 
> 
> This looks like you are doing something wrong and should either
> put the actual number into DT,

This is the actual number, except that there's some useless registers
in between. Allwinner documents it like that:

0x0	Reset 0
0x4	Reset 1
0xc	Reset 2

So we have to adjust the offset to account with the blank register in
between (0x8).

> or use a two-cell representation, with the first cell indicating the
> block (0, 1 or 2), and the second cell the index.

And the missing register is not a block either.

That would also imply either changing the bindings of that driver (and
all the current DTS that are using it), or introducing a whole new
driver just to deal with some extraordinary offset calculation.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com