From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756317AbbKDTkG (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2015 14:40:06 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-f47.google.com ([209.85.220.47]:36200 "EHLO mail-pa0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751538AbbKDTkE (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2015 14:40:04 -0500 Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 11:40:00 -0800 From: Eduardo Valentin To: Dawei Chien Cc: Viresh Kumar , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Matthias Brugger , Daniel Kurtz , Sascha Hauer , Daniel Lezcano , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, Sascha Hauer Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] thermal: mediatek: Add cpu power cooling model. Message-ID: <20151104193958.GC14127@localhost.localdomain> References: <1445515359-8587-1-git-send-email-dawei.chien@mediatek.com> <1445515359-8587-2-git-send-email-dawei.chien@mediatek.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1445515359-8587-2-git-send-email-dawei.chien@mediatek.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 08:02:38PM +0800, Dawei Chien wrote: > This power model is base on Intelligent Power Allocation (IPA) > technical, requires that the operating-points of the CPUs are > registered using the kernel's opp library and the > `cpufreq_frequency_table` is assigned to the `struct device` > of the cpu MT8173. > > Signed-off-by: Dawei.Chien > --- > This patch is base on > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7034601/ > --- > drivers/cpufreq/mt8173-cpufreq.c | 152 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- Given that you are proposing this on top a DT binding, why reading a table of static power model applicable only to mt8173 cpufreq driver? I have not seen anything specific (formula etc) that prevents this code to be generalized to other CPUs. Can you please help me to understand? BR, > 1 file changed, 144 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/mt8173-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/mt8173-cpufreq.c > index 49caed2..23c19c5 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/mt8173-cpufreq.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/mt8173-cpufreq.c > @@ -29,6 +29,16 @@ > #define MAX_VOLT_LIMIT (1150000) > #define VOLT_TOL (10000) > > +struct mtk_cpu_static_power { > + unsigned long voltage; > + unsigned int power; > +}; > + > +static struct mtk_cpu_static_power *mtk_ca53_static_power_table; > +static struct mtk_cpu_static_power *mtk_ca57_static_power_table; > +static int mtk_ca53_static_table_length; > +static int mtk_ca57_static_table_length; > + > /* > * The struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info holds necessary information for doing CPU DVFS > * on each CPU power/clock domain of Mediatek SoCs. Each CPU cluster in > @@ -51,6 +61,110 @@ struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info { > bool need_voltage_tracking; > }; > > +unsigned int mtk_cpufreq_lookup_power(const struct mtk_cpu_static_power *table, > + unsigned int count, unsigned long voltage) > +{ > + int i; > + > + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { > + if (voltage <= table[i].voltage) > + return table[i].power; > + } > + > + return table[count - 1].power; > +} > + > +int mtk_cpufreq_get_static(cpumask_t *cpumask, int interval, > + unsigned long voltage, u32 *power) > +{ > + int nr_cpus = cpumask_weight(cpumask); > + > + *power = 0; > + > + if (nr_cpus) { > + if (cpumask_test_cpu(0, cpumask)) > + *power += mtk_cpufreq_lookup_power( > + mtk_ca53_static_power_table, > + mtk_ca53_static_table_length, > + voltage); > + > + if (cpumask_test_cpu(2, cpumask)) > + *power += mtk_cpufreq_lookup_power( > + mtk_ca57_static_power_table, > + mtk_ca57_static_table_length, > + voltage); > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +unsigned int mtk_get_power_table_info(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, > + struct device_node *np, const char *node_name) > +{ > + int mtk_static_table_length; > + const struct property *prop; > + struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info = policy->driver_data; > + struct device *cpu_dev = info->cpu_dev; > + const __be32 *val; > + int nr, i; > + > + prop = of_find_property(np, node_name, NULL); > + > + if (!prop) { > + pr_err("failed to get static-power-points\n"); > + return -ENODEV; > + } > + > + if (!prop->value) { > + pr_err("failed to get static power array data\n"); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + nr = prop->length / sizeof(u32); > + > + if (nr % 2) { > + pr_err("Invalid OPP list\n"); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + mtk_static_table_length = nr / 2; > + > + if (cpumask_test_cpu(0, policy->related_cpus)) { > + mtk_ca53_static_table_length = mtk_static_table_length; > + mtk_ca53_static_power_table = devm_kcalloc(cpu_dev, > + mtk_static_table_length, > + sizeof(*mtk_ca53_static_power_table), > + GFP_KERNEL); > + > + val = prop->value; > + for (i = 0; i < mtk_static_table_length; ++i) { > + unsigned long voltage = be32_to_cpup(val++); > + unsigned int power = be32_to_cpup(val++); > + > + mtk_ca53_static_power_table[i].voltage = voltage; > + mtk_ca53_static_power_table[i].power = power; > + pr_info("volt:%ld uv, power:%d mW\n", voltage, power); > + } > + } else { > + mtk_ca57_static_table_length = mtk_static_table_length; > + mtk_ca57_static_power_table = devm_kcalloc(cpu_dev, > + mtk_static_table_length, > + sizeof(*mtk_ca57_static_power_table), > + GFP_KERNEL); > + val = prop->value; > + for (i = 0; i < mtk_static_table_length; ++i) { > + unsigned long voltage = be32_to_cpup(val++); > + unsigned int power = be32_to_cpup(val++); > + > + mtk_ca57_static_power_table[i].voltage = voltage; > + mtk_ca57_static_power_table[i].power = power; > + pr_info("volt:%ld uv, power:%d mW\n", voltage, power); > + } > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > static int mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info, > int new_vproc) > { > @@ -267,20 +381,40 @@ static void mtk_cpufreq_ready(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > { > struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info = policy->driver_data; > struct device_node *np = of_node_get(info->cpu_dev->of_node); > + u32 capacitance; > + int ret; > > if (WARN_ON(!np)) > return; > > if (of_find_property(np, "#cooling-cells", NULL)) { > - info->cdev = of_cpufreq_cooling_register(np, > - policy->related_cpus); > > - if (IS_ERR(info->cdev)) { > - dev_err(info->cpu_dev, > - "running cpufreq without cooling device: %ld\n", > - PTR_ERR(info->cdev)); > + if (!info->cdev) { > + > + of_property_read_u32(np, > + "dynamic-power-coefficient", > + &capacitance); > + > + ret = mtk_get_power_table_info(policy, np, > + "static-power-points"); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(info->cpu_dev, > + "cpufreq without static-points: %d\n", > + ret); > + } > + > + info->cdev = of_cpufreq_power_cooling_register(np, > + policy->related_cpus, > + capacitance, > + mtk_cpufreq_get_static); > + > + if (IS_ERR(info->cdev)) { > + dev_err(info->cpu_dev, > + "cpufreq without cdev: %ld\n", > + PTR_ERR(info->cdev)); > + info->cdev = NULL; > + } > > - info->cdev = NULL; > } > } > > @@ -460,7 +594,9 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > { > struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info = policy->driver_data; > > - cpufreq_cooling_unregister(info->cdev); > + if (info->cdev) > + cpufreq_cooling_unregister(info->cdev); > + > dev_pm_opp_free_cpufreq_table(info->cpu_dev, &policy->freq_table); > mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_release(info); > kfree(info); > -- > 1.7.9.5 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html