From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1032838AbbKEOFG (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 5 Nov 2015 09:05:06 -0500
Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.153]:58725 "EHLO
	e35.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1030850AbbKEOFE (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 5 Nov 2015 09:05:04 -0500
X-IBM-Helo: d03dlp03.boulder.ibm.com
X-IBM-MailFrom: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
X-IBM-RcptTo: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 06:04:46 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Stephane Eranian <eranian@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: perf related lockdep bug
Message-ID: <20151105140446.GD29027@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
References: <20151104051717.GA6098@codemonkey.org.uk>
 <20151104102151.GG17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20151104102800.GZ11639@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20151104105010.GA11639@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20151104134838.GR29027@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20151104205836.GZ3533@two.firstfloor.org>
 <20151105005528.GX29027@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20151105024607.GD3533@two.firstfloor.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20151105024607.GD3533@two.firstfloor.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER
x-cbid: 15110514-0013-0000-0000-000019FA0B4C
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 03:46:07AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 04:55:28PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 09:58:36PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > 
> > > I tested my perf stress workload with the patch applied on 4.3,
> > > unfortunately got a hang again :-/
> > 
> > Any diagnostics, sysrq-T output, or whatever?
> 
> The system was dead in the screen saver, no serial console.
> I restarted it and may have some more information tomorrow.
> 
> The previous hangs were usually timeout on smp_call_function,
> so one CPU disappeared.
> 
> I'll try the extra hunk you pointed out.

Thank you, looking forward to seeing what you get from this.

							Thanx, Paul