From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753645AbbKJS1Z (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:27:25 -0500 Received: from down.free-electrons.com ([37.187.137.238]:45139 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752696AbbKJS1U convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:27:20 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 19:26:59 +0100 From: Boris Brezillon To: Thierry Reding Cc: Heiko =?UTF-8?B?U3TDvGJuZXI=?= , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown , Liam Girdwood , Jingoo Han , Lee Jones , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, Bryan Wu , Richard Purdie , Jacek Anaszewski , linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, Maxime Ripard , linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , Tomi Valkeinen , Daniel Mack , Haojian Zhuang , Robert Jarzmik , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Doug Anderson , Uwe =?UTF-8?B?S2xlaW5lLUvDtm5pZw==?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update Message-ID: <20151110192659.3eaa800c@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: <20151110173416.GB21727@ulmo> References: <1442828009-6241-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <2341981.a79ioYM9Es@diego> <20151110173416.GB21727@ulmo> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.27; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Thierry, On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:34:16 +0100 Thierry Reding wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 12:12:12PM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote: > > Hi Thierry, > > > > Am Montag, 21. September 2015, 11:33:17 schrieb Boris Brezillon: > > > Hello, > > > > > > This series adds support for atomic PWM update, or IOW, the capability > > > to update all the parameters of a PWM device (enabled/disabled, period, > > > duty and polarity) in one go. > > > > is anything more blocking this series? It's now sitting on the lists for > > nearly a month and everybody seems happy with it, so it would be really nice > > to have in mainline :-) . > > > > Especially as this also makes it possible for Rockchip Chromebooks to actually > > control the logic-regulator that is implemented as pwm-regulator there. > > Last time I tried to put this into linux-next I got immediately > bombarded by a number of build failures, so I backed things out. The > current plan is to give this another try after v4.4-rc1. Could you paste the build failures (I didn't receive any notification)? BTW, I just rebased my branch on pwm/for-next and it seems to compile correctly, but maybe you're compiling on more platforms (or different drivers than I do). Best Regards, Boris -- Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com