From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933065AbbLCJ5b (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2015 04:57:31 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:33849 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932655AbbLCJ52 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2015 04:57:28 -0500 Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 10:57:26 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Matias =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F8rling?= Cc: Jens Axboe , Mark Brown , Keith Busch , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree Message-ID: <20151203095726.GA15428@lst.de> References: <20151202161936.22b23668cf9dea9872b5079b@kernel.org> <20151202164527.GA31048@lst.de> <565F5D96.5050902@kernel.dk> <565FFFA5.6000003@bjorling.me> <20151203090638.GA14329@lst.de> <566010EE.6050806@bjorling.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <566010EE.6050806@bjorling.me> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 10:52:46AM +0100, Matias Bjørling wrote: > The identify geometry command and bad block commands are part of the admin > command set. Surely, as all these take a ns id, they can be moved and be > accessed naturally through the user queues. Nah, these admin commands should go through the admin queue - but having a request_queue as the argument to the callback just seems rather off if it's not the right one. Why can't you just pass the 'struct nvm_dev' instead of the request_queue for these methods?