From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1760004AbbLCLYx (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 3 Dec 2015 06:24:53 -0500
Received: from mail-pf0-f169.google.com ([209.85.192.169]:33335 "EHLO
	mail-pf0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1759769AbbLCLYu (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 3 Dec 2015 06:24:50 -0500
X-Greylist: delayed 26195 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 06:24:50 EST
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 16:54:46 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: Ben Gamari <ben@smart-cactus.org>, Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>,
        Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>,
        Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
        Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org>,
        Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de>,
        Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        b.zolnierkie@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/12] cpufreq: Add support for Exynos 5800, 5420, and
 5422
Message-ID: <20151203112446.GD2097@ubuntu>
References: <1449091167-20758-1-git-send-email-ben@smart-cactus.org>
 <20151203060527.GH4302@ubuntu>
 <566021E2.6070000@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <566021E2.6070000@arm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 03-12-15, 11:05, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> The main difference is that we get the OPPs from the firmware rather
> than DT. We may just need to abstract that part and we should be able to
> use it. I will have a look at it and get back to you will more details.
> It has been a while since I looked at cpufreq-dt.

I forgot that :( .. but we can then create OPPs at runtime based on
what's available from firmware. And we also have an API now to set
which CPUs share OPPs... so that might be used as well..

-- 
viresh