From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756177AbbLHAlx (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Dec 2015 19:41:53 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:36764 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754049AbbLHAlv (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Dec 2015 19:41:51 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,397,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="614200889" Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 20:41:43 -0500 From: "Raj, Ashok" To: Borislav Petkov Cc: "Luck, Tony" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" , ashok.raj@intel.com Subject: Re: [Patch V2] x86, mce: Ensure offline CPU's don't participate in mce rendezvous process. Message-ID: <20151208014142.GA82345@otc-brkl-03.jf.intel.com> References: <20151205002930.GA24005@otc-brkl-03.jf.intel.com> <20151207200019.GH22248@pd.tnic> <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F39F7C24B@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com> <20151207201951.GI22248@pd.tnic> <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F39F7C3A4@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com> <20151207223427.GJ22248@pd.tnic> <20151207234639.GA81526@otc-brkl-03.jf.intel.com> <20151207232524.GK22248@pd.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151207232524.GK22248@pd.tnic> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 12:25:24AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > Did you miss my statement in my previous mail where I said that the MCE > is being raised only on the cores of node 0? > That's right.. but i think if MCE is only given to node0, then the system would panic eveytime with or without the patch. which is why i got confused. I somehow misunderstood that with this patch the system didn't panic. Cheers, Ashok