From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752401AbcACUPd (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Jan 2016 15:15:33 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:37788 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751245AbcACUPb (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Jan 2016 15:15:31 -0500 Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 12:15:30 -0800 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: SF Markus Elfring Cc: Julia Lawall , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Lior Dotan , Christopher Harrer Subject: Re: staging-slicoss: Replace variable initialisations by assignments in slic_if_init() Message-ID: <20160103201530.GA32494@kroah.com> References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <56894D2D.1010801@users.sourceforge.net> <56895EE1.7080808@users.sourceforge.net> <20160103175816.GA21611@kroah.com> <56896591.2030208@users.sourceforge.net> <20160103182640.GA30692@kroah.com> <56896D6A.6020309@users.sourceforge.net> <20160103194522.GA31644@kroah.com> <56898045.9010907@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56898045.9010907@users.sourceforge.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 09:10:45PM +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > >> Can such fine-tuning result in positive effects for the run-time behaviour? > > > > If you can not benchmark and show the proof, don't even start to claim > > such a thing. > > Which measurement results would you accept for further discussion? If you don't know how to show your results, then this whole discussion is pointless. *plonk*