From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Brian Austin <brian.austin@cirrus.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Paul Handrigan <Paul.Handrigan@cirrus.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: cs35l32: avoid uninitialized variable access
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 15:45:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160104154511.GL16023@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9222694.IRNnfpj6Tn@wuerfel>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 707 bytes --]
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 04:17:47PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Saturday 02 January 2016 14:17:46 Mark Brown wrote:
> > This would be a lot nicer if there was an __always_null annotation we
> > could put on of_node for !OF configurations, that'd Just Work and this
> > can't be the only case where we have this idiom.
> How about an inline helper like
> static inline struct device_node *dev_of_node(struct device *dev)
> {
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF))
> return dev->of_node;
> }
Yeah, that'd work as well (with the correction Russell mentioned) - it's
a bit more typing but we already do similar things for the ID tables and
it looks nicer than the IS_ENABLED() in code does.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-04 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-01 23:19 [PATCH] ASoC: cs35l32: avoid uninitialized variable access Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-02 14:17 ` Mark Brown
2016-01-04 15:17 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-04 15:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-01-04 16:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-04 16:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-01-04 15:45 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2016-03-07 4:19 Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-07 12:22 ` Austin, Brian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160104154511.GL16023@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=Paul.Handrigan@cirrus.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=brian.austin@cirrus.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).