From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759705AbcAKM0s (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2016 07:26:48 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:54927 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752006AbcAKM0q (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2016 07:26:46 -0500 Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 12:26:44 +0000 From: Liviu Dudau To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Thierry Reding , David Airlie , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/3] drm: arm-hdlcd: add explictit DRM dependency Message-ID: <20160111122644.GH13633@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <4194408.X82ccDjh5X@wuerfel> <4350671.DP0mBIml5S@wuerfel> <20160111111255.GE13633@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <10589993.Lxk3kTHnpj@wuerfel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <10589993.Lxk3kTHnpj@wuerfel> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 01:18:55PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 11 January 2016 11:12:56 Liviu Dudau wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 09:39:46AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Monday 04 January 2016 09:24:16 Thierry Reding wrote: > > > > > > > > Ugh... wouldn't it be much simpler to get rid of DRM_ARM? It seems like > > > > a completely superfluous option to me. I don't think we've ever had the > > > > equivalent of "vendor" Kconfig options in DRM, and I don't see why we'd > > > > need to start now. If ARM was going to add another driver it can simply > > > > have a separate Kconfig entry. There should be no need to select the > > > > vendor option first. > > > > > > Fine with me too. I vaguely remembered having seen some discussion about > > > this, so I decided to do a minimal fix, but I agree that would be more > > > in line with the other drivers. > > > > > > Arnd > > > > > > > Arnd, > > > > I'm OK with the whole series of Kconfig clean-up/fixes and I offer my appologies > > for adding noise with my patchset. Please let me know how do you prefer to handle > > them. I'm OK with merging your changes into my series before sending the pull > > request to David Airlie. > > Please merge them into your tree if you have some other changes to send to him. > > I just realized that these are in your own git tree at the moment, not > in drm-next. I guess that means you will rebase the whole series after -rc1 and > submit it into linux-4.6, right? Yes, that is the plan. > > If so, just fold my fixes into your patches when you rebase. OK, will do. Repeating the question on another thread: are you OK with me carrying the Juno .dts changes through drm-next for HDLCD and you picking up Robin Murphy's patch? AFAIK those are the only changes at the moment until Sudeep re-submits the Juno r2 dts changes. Best regards, Liviu > > Arnd > -- ==================== | I would like to | | fix the world, | | but they're not | | giving me the | \ source code! / --------------- ¯\_(ツ)_/¯