From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934409AbcALNi1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jan 2016 08:38:27 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com ([74.125.82.66]:32781 "EHLO mail-wm0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752758AbcALNiY (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jan 2016 08:38:24 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 14:38:20 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Andy Lutomirski , Dave Hansen , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Brian Gerst , Oleg Nesterov Subject: Re: Rethinking sigcontext's xfeatures slightly for PKRU's benefit? Message-ID: <20160112133820.GA6840@gmail.com> References: <20151218085914.GA16529@infradead.org> <20151218125753.GF16977@pd.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151218125753.GF16977@pd.tnic> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:59:14AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Stupid question, but what the heck is PKRU? A grep of the kernel tree > > shows no results, and a web search returns mostly Thai language results. > > That should explain it: > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20151214190542.39C4886D@viggo.jf.intel.com There's also an LWN article from last year, as background: https://lwn.net/Articles/643797/ Thanks, Ingo