From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: static_cpu_has_safe: discard dynamic check after init
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:05:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160118230554.GJ12651@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <569D40CE.5090506@zytor.com>
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 11:45:18AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> I think the two-byte optimization is the real issue if there is one at
> all.
Well, we do optimize the jumps for a couple releases now, see
recompute_jump(). So we would always get the short JMP, if made possible
by how gcc lays out the code so that the target is not far away. If the
JMP to the dynamic branch doesn't get nopped out anyway, that is.
We have "debug-alternative" to dump exactly what happens during
patching.
> I don't care about the inittext, and unless I'm misremembering
> completely altinstructions also get ejected.
Ah yes, they do.
> So I don't personally object to killing off the unsafe variant.
Ok.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-18 23:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-16 19:22 [PATCH] x86: static_cpu_has_safe: discard dynamic check after init Brian Gerst
2016-01-16 19:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-16 19:58 ` Brian Gerst
2016-01-17 10:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-18 16:52 ` Brian Gerst
2016-01-18 17:49 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-01-18 18:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-18 18:29 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-01-18 18:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-18 19:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-01-18 23:05 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2016-01-18 23:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-01-18 23:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-19 13:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-19 16:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-19 23:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-19 23:26 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-01-19 23:49 ` Boris Petkov
2016-01-20 4:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-01-20 10:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-20 10:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-01-21 22:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-21 22:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-01-21 22:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-21 23:36 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-01-21 23:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-01-22 10:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-18 18:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-19 1:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-19 1:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-01-19 9:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-20 4:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-01-20 4:39 ` Brian Gerst
2016-01-20 4:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-01-20 10:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-20 10:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-01-20 11:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-20 14:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-01-20 15:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-20 15:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-01-20 16:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-20 16:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-01-23 6:50 [PATCH] x86/head_64.S: do not use temporary register to check alignment Alexander Kuleshov
2016-01-26 9:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-26 21:12 [PATCH 00/10] tip-queue 2016-01-26, rest Borislav Petkov
2016-01-26 21:12 ` [PATCH 01/10] x86/asm: Add condition codes clobber to memory barrier macros Borislav Petkov
2016-01-26 21:12 ` [PATCH 02/10] x86/asm: Drop a comment left over from X86_OOSTORE Borislav Petkov
2016-01-26 21:12 ` [PATCH 03/10] x86/asm: Tweak the comment about wmb() use for IO Borislav Petkov
2016-01-26 21:12 ` [PATCH 04/10] x86/cpufeature: Carve out X86_FEATURE_* Borislav Petkov
2016-01-30 13:18 ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-01-26 21:12 ` [PATCH 05/10] x86/cpufeature: Replace the old static_cpu_has() with safe variant Borislav Petkov
2016-01-30 13:19 ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-01-26 21:12 ` [PATCH 06/10] x86/cpufeature: Get rid of the non-asm goto variant Borislav Petkov
2016-01-27 3:36 ` Brian Gerst
2016-01-27 8:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-27 8:43 ` [PATCH -v1.1 " Borislav Petkov
2016-01-30 13:19 ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-01-27 8:45 ` [PATCH -v1.1 8/10] x86/alternatives: Discard dynamic check after init Borislav Petkov
2016-01-30 13:20 ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Brian Gerst
2016-01-26 21:12 ` [PATCH 07/10] x86/alternatives: Add an auxilary section Borislav Petkov
2016-01-30 13:19 ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-01-26 21:12 ` [PATCH 08/10] x86/alternatives: Discard dynamic check after init Borislav Petkov
2016-01-26 21:12 ` [PATCH 09/10] x86/vdso: Use static_cpu_has() Borislav Petkov
2016-01-30 13:20 ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-01-26 21:12 ` [PATCH 10/10] x86/head_64: Simplify kernel load address alignment check Borislav Petkov
2016-01-30 13:20 ` [tip:x86/boot] x86/boot: " tip-bot for Alexander Kuleshov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160118230554.GJ12651@pd.tnic \
--to=bp@suse.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).