From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754229AbcAVQMH (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jan 2016 11:12:07 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com ([74.125.82.50]:36408 "EHLO mail-wm0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751299AbcAVQMG (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jan 2016 11:12:06 -0500 Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 17:12:02 +0100 From: Michal Hocko To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Sasha Levin , LKML , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: mm, vmstat: kernel BUG at mm/vmstat.c:1408! Message-ID: <20160122161201.GC19465@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <569FAC90.5030407@oracle.com> <20160120212806.GA26965@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20160121082402.GA29520@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20160121165148.GF29520@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20160122140418.GB19465@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri 22-01-16 10:07:01, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jan 2016, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > Wouldn't it be much more easier and simply get rid of the VM_BUG_ON? > > What is the point of keeping it in the first place. The code can > > perfectly cope with the race. > > Ok then lets do that. Could you repost the patch with the updated description? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs