From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757284AbcBBSVn (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Feb 2016 13:21:43 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:57705 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757255AbcBBSVj (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Feb 2016 13:21:39 -0500 Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 18:21:10 +0000 From: Mark Rutland To: Gregory CLEMENT Cc: Jason Cooper , Andrew Lunn , Sebastian Hesselbarth , arm@kernel.org, Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Jonathan Corbet , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo , Hans de Goede , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Petazzoni , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Wilson Ding , Nadav Haklai Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] serial: mvebu-uart: initial support for Armada-3700 serial port Message-ID: <20160202182109.GC29778@leverpostej> References: <1454436468-4241-1-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> <1454436468-4241-2-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> <20160202181929.GB29778@leverpostej> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160202181929.GB29778@leverpostej> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 06:19:29PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 07:07:39PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: > > From: Wilson Ding > > > > Armada-3700's uart is a simple serial port, which doesn't > > support. Configuring the modem control lines. The uart port has a 32 > > bytes Tx FIFO and a 64 bytes Rx FIFO > > > > The uart driver implements the uart core operations. It also support the > > system (early) console based on Armada-3700's serial port. > > > > Known Issue: > > > > The uart driver currently doesn't support clock programming, which means > > the baud-rate stays with the default value configured by the bootloader > > at boot time > > This looks like any other early console. > > Why does this not use the earlycon infrastructure? Ah, it does, and I misread the diff quite badly. Apologies for the noise. Mark.