From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756406AbcBCGyr (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2016 01:54:47 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-f179.google.com ([209.85.192.179]:35004 "EHLO mail-pf0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754995AbcBCGyp (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2016 01:54:45 -0500 Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 12:24:42 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Saravana Kannan Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Juri Lelli , Rafael Wysocki , Lists linaro-kernel , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Peter Zijlstra , Michael Turquette , Steve Muckle , Vincent Guittot , Morten Rasmussen , dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] cpufreq: governor: Create separate sysfs-ops Message-ID: <20160203065442.GV31828@vireshk> References: <5a012e56b8404e2d07e172b6699ce02f5c5b5f26.1454410226.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <20160202154717.GI3947@e106622-lin> <20160202170144.GL3947@e106622-lin> <56B12BEC.9070603@codeaurora.org> <56B158A0.6060604@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56B158A0.6060604@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02-02-16, 17:32, Saravana Kannan wrote: > But if we are expecting sched dvfs to come in, why make it worse for it. It > would be completely pointless to try and shoehorn sched dvfs to use > cpufreq_governor.c We can move the common part to cpufreq core and not make sched-dvfs reuse cpufreq_governor.c -- viresh