From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754434AbcBCJof (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2016 04:44:35 -0500 Received: from mx2.parallels.com ([199.115.105.18]:35823 "EHLO mx2.parallels.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753849AbcBCJoc (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2016 04:44:32 -0500 Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 12:44:20 +0300 From: Vladimir Davydov To: Dmitry Safonov CC: , , , , , , , <0x7f454c46@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] mm/slab: fix race with dereferencing NULL ptr in alloc_calls_show Message-ID: <20160203094420.GH21016@esperanza> References: <1454485933-762-1-git-send-email-dsafonov@virtuozzo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1454485933-762-1-git-send-email-dsafonov@virtuozzo.com> X-ClientProxiedBy: US-EXCH2.sw.swsoft.com (10.255.249.46) To US-EXCH.sw.swsoft.com (10.255.249.47) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 10:52:13AM +0300, Dmitry Safonov wrote: ... > diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c > index b50aef0..2bfc0b1 100644 > --- a/mm/slab_common.c > +++ b/mm/slab_common.c > @@ -451,6 +451,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmem_cache_create); > static int shutdown_cache(struct kmem_cache *s, > struct list_head *release, bool *need_rcu_barrier) > { > + sysfs_slab_remove(s); > + shutdown_cache is called with slab_mutex held. slab_attr_store may take the mutex. So placing sysfs_slab_remove here introduces a potential deadlock. > if (__kmem_cache_shutdown(s) != 0) > return -EBUSY; > > @@ -468,13 +470,8 @@ static void release_caches(struct list_head *release, bool need_rcu_barrier) > if (need_rcu_barrier) > rcu_barrier(); > > - list_for_each_entry_safe(s, s2, release, list) { > -#ifdef SLAB_SUPPORTS_SYSFS > - sysfs_slab_remove(s); > -#else > + list_for_each_entry_safe(s, s2, release, list) > slab_kmem_cache_release(s); > -#endif > - } > } > > #if defined(CONFIG_MEMCG) && !defined(CONFIG_SLOB) > @@ -614,6 +611,7 @@ void memcg_destroy_kmem_caches(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) > list_for_each_entry_safe(s, s2, &slab_caches, list) { > if (is_root_cache(s) || s->memcg_params.memcg != memcg) > continue; > + Please remove this hunk. > /* > * The cgroup is about to be freed and therefore has no charges > * left. Hence, all its caches must be empty by now. > diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c > index 2e1355a..b6a68b7 100644 > --- a/mm/slub.c > +++ b/mm/slub.c > @@ -5296,11 +5296,6 @@ static void memcg_propagate_slab_attrs(struct kmem_cache *s) > #endif > } > > -static void kmem_cache_release(struct kobject *k) > -{ > - slab_kmem_cache_release(to_slab(k)); > -} > - > static const struct sysfs_ops slab_sysfs_ops = { > .show = slab_attr_show, > .store = slab_attr_store, > @@ -5308,7 +5303,6 @@ static const struct sysfs_ops slab_sysfs_ops = { > > static struct kobj_type slab_ktype = { > .sysfs_ops = &slab_sysfs_ops, > - .release = kmem_cache_release, I surmise this will resurrect the bug that was fixed by 41a212859a4dd ("slub: use sysfs'es release mechanism for kmem_cache"). Thanks, Vladimir