From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752949AbcBEOdc (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:33:32 -0500 Received: from down.free-electrons.com ([37.187.137.238]:55595 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750920AbcBEOda (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:33:30 -0500 Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 15:33:28 +0100 From: Maxime Ripard To: Mark Brown Cc: Rob Herring , Chen-Yu Tsai , Liam Girdwood , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] regulator: Add coupled regulator Message-ID: <20160205143328.GD31506@lukather> References: <1452605842-9317-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <1452605842-9317-2-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <20160112143100.GA14628@rob-hp-laptop> <20160115085734.GG4581@lukather> <20160117000434.GB7774@rob-hp-laptop> <20160118162538.GH6588@sirena.org.uk> <20160121154649.GE3997@lukather> <20160121162802.GL6588@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JwB53PgKC5A7+0Ej" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160121162802.GL6588@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --JwB53PgKC5A7+0Ej Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Mark, On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 04:28:02PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 04:46:49PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: >=20 > > I guess a separate driver would make it easier to deal with cases like > > the one you suggested (shutting down when the load is going to be > > lower). I don't see how we could have a good DT representation of that > > if we're going to use lists. >=20 > We can have a driver regardless of what the DT looks like, it's a > question of how things get instantiated. >=20 > > Anyway, I'm fine with both approaches, just let me know what you > > prefer. >=20 > Without seeing an implementation of the lists it's hard to say. Just to make sure we're on the same page: you want to keep the regulator, but instead of giving the parent through vinX-supplies properties, you want to have a single *-supply property, with a list of regulators, right? Thanks! Maxime --=20 Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com --JwB53PgKC5A7+0Ej Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWtLK4AAoJEBx+YmzsjxAguNoQALmfXhbIgg1W/Xw3LZgD4nrZ R751Jt56rA/0dIwaNBQE3/lbFu4VSgeB4Htl6avk4aLhic+QRwB8N2VmtW5UA0Tx T6OcGJmJ5MbY/36xexX+2iQodWB2xedNEzLNKlfq22ZtVXnF3otKRD6eBL0Zvs5U cRYVAT18+UmAYAkpTJZJCSly5Mn+WqagFCt2Ry8+6liUukFHXMmbvgHGRRBOuDHi QcBa9bYoOzIlGJLSba9UU2fUZFusYI+pDcf+iNdZCL6cfw90ZtTnYANKwjeP7XPm sKXTrvvmlHJbfFRLpFEQ9QIgbsbstH3clZcMK8lbJw6DYU815SsDkKjfXWcJnOkR jqBS/Pr8cue++/167WlueBByppbKvGyki33eyFDA6G0zbl3Bsgu8A88Nje95dxoi 62GiZM29PCSyvfldRAWFTB/HkkadSTd4RmRO/c2YSbRwrmykTANYSpbzSGXWxvCJ B4cC/fRVedboeQJmQL25H0ZldlaVFvpF7sxAF8oxKOuBFcT8K7QyfsW65l+8IbYu CJC9dUgPbmJ2YkpauiG5oZpbD8w1cTYQt7E78V42DLVq3uQIzEn8Emaf4Vnnm4HP h1IVy+gzp2VfaBziLKFROjF3vUUWhwy0oZe7MFMBDVYrh/P3EHZBZNc+KySP4Xm8 0pWUvNjvhb2C7yYMy8zB =5OpA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JwB53PgKC5A7+0Ej--