From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754835AbcBEPdP (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Feb 2016 10:33:15 -0500 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:36467 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753990AbcBEPdN (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Feb 2016 10:33:13 -0500 Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 15:32:58 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Maxime Ripard Cc: Rob Herring , Chen-Yu Tsai , Liam Girdwood , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20160205153258.GW4455@sirena.org.uk> References: <1452605842-9317-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <1452605842-9317-2-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <20160112143100.GA14628@rob-hp-laptop> <20160115085734.GG4581@lukather> <20160117000434.GB7774@rob-hp-laptop> <20160118162538.GH6588@sirena.org.uk> <20160121154649.GE3997@lukather> <20160121162802.GL6588@sirena.org.uk> <20160205143328.GD31506@lukather> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="t98UOKzcpBZ5uth4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160205143328.GD31506@lukather> X-Cookie: Duckies are fun! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:348:6:8808:fab::3 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] regulator: Add coupled regulator X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --t98UOKzcpBZ5uth4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 03:33:28PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 04:28:02PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 04:46:49PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > Anyway, I'm fine with both approaches, just let me know what you > > > prefer. > > Without seeing an implementation of the lists it's hard to say. > Just to make sure we're on the same page: you want to keep the > regulator, but instead of giving the parent through vinX-supplies > properties, you want to have a single *-supply property, with a list > of regulators, right? Either that or an explicit regulator describing the merge. Rob wants the list I think but I really don't care. --t98UOKzcpBZ5uth4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWtMCqAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQHgMH/22Mv0tmtSKgweJSjdnHwzsf uH79vuOCzj57ggAmMk2bL6Klg+xDP5MC9B6YqtxnHl57f9YCjKEGD5iMFrnQ7stR b+LnMYQP7BMKQk+rwT7IMJF+qYzsXLZIGjS1WZ1qWCYgyr2fP3Vi30Bv56na9n1Y owAUpp4IEaRe2pMrma8RHMelAtJH3oRypUcqkBk5c8yRR3WHtDXCNVe0cq9c3P/s vHYjcI/ZAVKktQEJSDXY/OHlUUTxeZ37FASEUOjXi3vQi/7iTILlFxoPFtFBCNa8 z7ocPWzbfBRSZUdnOiGibqPAsjEx4tjozhvcD32hnf4cCaeeeXw1ncng2WPxpHM= =Oz4a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --t98UOKzcpBZ5uth4--