linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/12] cpufreq: governor: Close dbs_data update race condition
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:54:09 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160218052409.GG2610@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1592265.QLnTJA45ZD@vostro.rjw.lan>

On 18-02-16, 02:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> 
> It is possible for a dbs_data object to be updated after its
> usage counter has become 0.  That may happen if governor_store()
> runs (via a govenor tunable sysfs attribute write) in parallel
> with cpufreq_governor_exit() called for the last cpufreq policy
> associated with the dbs_data in question.  In that case, if
> governor_store() acquires dbs_data->mutex right after
> cpufreq_governor_exit() has released it, the ->store() callback
> invoked by it may operate on dbs_data with no users.  Although
> sysfs will cause the kobject_put() in cpufreq_governor_exit() to
> block until governor_store() has returned, that situation may
> lead to some unexpected results, depending on the implementation
> of the ->store callback, and therefore it should be avoided.
> 
> To that end, modify governor_store() to check the dbs_data's
> usage count before invoking the ->store() callback and return
> an error if it is 0 at that point.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static ssize_t governor_store(struct kob
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&dbs_data->mutex);
>  
> -	if (gattr->store)
> +	if (dbs_data->usage_count && gattr->store)

That's not gonna be enough. The above lock doesn't guarantee
protection with any such races. And so usage_count can become zero
just after this check.

Btw, we should also kill the gattr->store checks here as well, as we
did it in cpufreq-core.

>  		ret = gattr->store(dbs_data, buf, count);
>  
>  	mutex_unlock(&dbs_data->mutex);

-- 
viresh

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-18  5:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-18  1:17 [PATCH 0/12] cpufreq: More governor code reorganization Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-18  1:19 ` [PATCH 1/12] cpufreq: governor: Close dbs_data update race condition Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-18  5:24   ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2016-02-18 16:20     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-19  2:27       ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-19  2:34         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-19  3:09   ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-18  1:20 ` [PATCH 2/12] cpufreq: governor: Move io_is_busy to struct dbs_data Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-18  5:28   ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-18  1:21 ` [PATCH 3/12] cpufreq: governor: Add a ->start callback for governors Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-18  5:36   ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-18  1:22 ` [PATCH 4/12] cpufreq: governor: Drop unused governor callback and data fields Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-18  5:37   ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-18  1:24 ` [PATCH 5/12] cpufreq: ondemand: Drop one more callback from struct od_ops Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-18  5:38   ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-18  1:26 ` [PATCH 6/12] cpufreq: governor: Fix CPU load information updates via ->store Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-18  5:44   ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-18 17:37     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-18  1:28 ` [PATCH 7/12] cpufreq: ondemand: Rework the handling of powersave bias updates Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-18  5:53   ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-18  1:30 ` [PATCH 8/12] cpufreq: governor: Make governor private data per-policy Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-18  6:03   ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-18 17:56     ` [PATCH v2 " Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-19  2:36       ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-18  1:31 ` [PATCH 9/12] cpufreq: governor: Move per-CPU data to the common code Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-18  6:08   ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-18  1:32 ` [PATCH 10/12] cpufreq: governor: Relocate definitions of tuners structures Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-18  6:09   ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-18 17:57     ` [PATCH v2 " Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-19  2:36       ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-18  1:33 ` [PATCH 11/12] cpufreq: governor: Make dbs_data_mutex static Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-18  6:09   ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-18  1:38 ` [PATCH 12/12] cpufreq: governor: Narrow down the dbs_data_mutex coverage Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-18  6:20   ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-18 16:32     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-18 17:58     ` [PATCH v2 " Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-19  2:38       ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160218052409.GG2610@vireshk-i7 \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).