From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1946980AbcBRSst (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Feb 2016 13:48:49 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com ([74.125.82.50]:34572 "EHLO mail-wm0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1946859AbcBRSsr (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Feb 2016 13:48:47 -0500 Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 19:48:42 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Tony Luck , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 3/4] x86, mce: Add __mcsafe_copy() Message-ID: <20160218184842.GA16753@gmail.com> References: <20160218082107.GA17851@gmail.com> <20160218102959.GD3694@pd.tnic> <20160218103420.GA11011@gmail.com> <20160218103604.GA4019@pd.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160218103604.GA4019@pd.tnic> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 11:34:20AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Does the build fail - or is it just an unused function? If the latter > > then I'd rather leave the #ifdef out. > > Yep, it does fail: > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160207165524.GF5862@pd.tnic > > due to ex_handler_fault not being visible to UML. Ok, fair enough. Thanks, Ingo